1.0 Updates:

CSC208 Ethics—Elliott

Pick three different reasonable actions you propose. Give us a one-minute overview of them (twenty seconds each): (a) description (b) pros (c) cons.

Present a slightly more detailed (3 minutes) ethical analysis under Kant of one of them as follows:


First action analysis under Kant:

Kant imperfect duties (must perform in some circumstances): Kant specifies two imperfect duties: the duty of self-improvement and the duty to aid others. May have to choose which comes first: education, health, helping others, etc.

Kant perfect duties: (must always perform) Have all the internal resources for performing these all the time. Don't lie. Don't borrow money you won't pay back. Don't commit suicide.

Duties Notes A and Notes B


Second analysis under Act Utilitarian theory:

(Same or different action.) What is your gut feeling?

Who are the stakeholders?

What is the common unit of measure?

Problems translating into a common unit?

How do you justify the values you use?

Utility Get caught, expelled 0.2 Well-being over grade 0.3 Guilt 0.2 Betrayal 0.1 Money 0.2
Alice -5 +8 0 0 +3
Bob -2 +5 -5 0 -1
Carol -3 +8 -9 0 -4
Dave * 2 0 -4 0 -7 0
If you derived a rule for the greatest happiness, what would it be?

Give some intelligent commentary on Bentham's calculus and how at least one of these might apply to the above: