ExegesisZac B., DePaul faculty and former Writing Center tutor Please keep in mind that these are only general guidelines; always defer to your professor's specifications for a given assignment. If you have any questions about the content represented here, please contact the Writing Centers so that we can address them for you. Introduction Many philosophy and theology classes require students to perform some degree of exegesis, which is an unduly intimidating term most commonly encountered with regard to philosophical and religious texts. Exegesis is also known as argument reconstruction, and in this type of writing your task is to read through a text critically and then put the argument back together in your own words. It is not all that different from paraphrasing, for in exegesis you must restate the key claims of the philosopher or religious work in a clear and concise way. In lower-level courses you may need to write an exegesis on its own as an assignment, but in more advanced courses this type of writing will be incorporated into larger papers in which you are moving beyond this initial step and providing original insights as well. It is important to distinguish between exegesis and interpretation. In philosophy courses especially, exegetical writing will typically require that you withhold your own interpretations and simply explain what the author is saying. Think of it as an opportunity to demonstrate to your professor that you’ve both read and understood the assigned text. Many writers struggle with philosophy papers if they do not first understand the basics of exegetical writing, so if you are puzzled about how to do this, it is a good idea to read through the resources below and/or schedule an appointment with a writing consultant who specializes in this discipline. Philosophical vs. Religious Exegesis It is important to distinguish between religious exegesis and the type of exegesis you will most likely see in philosophy classes. Traditionally, the term “exegesis” was associated with the interpretation of religious texts. As such, in a theological or religious context the term is most commonly used to describe the act of interpreting a certain section from a religious text in order to arrive at the text’s meaning.In philosophical contexts, exegetical writing involves less interpretation and more restating. Instead of weighing in on the meaning of a philosophical argument, you’re basically just walking your reader through the steps of a philosopher’s argument in order to establish that you understand it. It’s important to be aware of these two major uses of the term “exegesis,” and if you’re still confused about which one applies to your particular assignment you can refer to your assignment prompt, consult your syllabus, or ask your professor. Steps in Writing Exegesis
Now, I can put this information together in a way that acknowledges the logical relationship between the individual points:
Helpful Tips
Additional Resources The UNC-Chapel Hill Writing Center offers useful step-by-step guidelines for argument reconstruction, as well as other aspects of writing philosophy papers.This resource from the University of Toronto provides more detail as to how one should approach an exegetical essay. The Department of Philosophy at DePaul provides some helpful Word document handouts on writing philosophy papers at the undergraduate level. |