Primary Source Collection 3, Document 1:
"Introductory Statement by the
[Central] Council of the Citizens' Association"
Source: Report of the Council of Hygiene and Public Health of the Citizens’ Association of New York upon the Sanitary Condition of the City, second edition  (New York: D. Appleton & Co., 1866) 

THE CITIZENS’ ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK was organized for purposes of public usefulness. The deep convictions of duty and necessity that led to the preparation of the plans upon which this Association has commenced its efforts, have met with hearty responses from all classes of philanthropic and learned men whose counsel and aid have been invoked in our voluntary work of municipal reform and public improvement. To its COUNCIL OF HYGIENE AND PUBLIC HEALTH, and to its Board of Legal Advisers, the Citizens’ Association, and the City of New York, have been placed under lasting obligations, for labors in which the greatest professional learning and skill, combined with noble and philanthropic purposes, and individual sacrifices of time and personal efforts, have been voluntarily contributed for the single object of promoting the welfare of the community, and benefiting all classes in the city.

The COUNCIL OF HYGIENE AND PUBLIC HEALTH now presents to this ASSOCIATION its first General Report upon the Sanitary Condition and Hygienic Wants of New York; and the CENTRAL COUNCIL of the ASSOCIATION has ordered it published and widely circulated, in order that the public may immediately have access to this valuable source of information and practical suggestion.

The organization and efforts of the Council of Hygiene were begun very soon after the general plan of the Citizens’ Association was announced. The advice and knowledge of leading hygienists and medical gentlemen of great familiarity with the social and sanitary necessities of the people of this City were sought, and, at the request of the Council of this Association, an effective organization for Sanitary Inquiry and Advice was instituted. The necessity that exists for the commencement of such voluntary labors has long been conceded by the managers of benevolent institutions in the city, and, from this and other circumstances, the members of this body were fully prepared to appreciate the practical value and bearings of such work. They have unhesitatingly acted upon the information and suggestions which their Council of Hygiene has rendered; and they desire to state that in all its labors, suggestions, and advice, that Council has manifestly been actuated by an earnest and fearless purpose to benefit mankind, and to contribute most directly to the physical and moral welfare of their fellow-citizens. Thus its plans have entirely harmonized with the great objects of the CITIZENS’ ASSOCIATION, and at the same time have furnished a perfect example of both the utility and the necessity of such voluntary effort.

The WORKS of the COUNCIL OF HYGIENE will best perpetuate the history of its organization; therefore we will simply put on record here the preliminary correspondence, in which, without any purpose of organized effort and cooperation, a large number of physicians, who are distinguished for learning and experience in hygiene, gave expression to the leading facts upon which the argument for Sanitary Reform is based by this ASSOCIATION.

 
 
The Citizens's Association of New York, 
Office, 813 Broadway. 
New York, March 2d, 1864
                          To: 
VALENTINE MOTT, M.D., ISAAC WOOD, M.D.,
WILLARD PARKER, M.D., CHARLES D SMITH, M.D.,
JAMES R. WOOD, M.D., E. R. PEASLEE, M.D.,
STEPHEN SMITH, M.D., AUSTIN FLINT, M.D.,
 JOHN H. GRISCOM, M.D., FRANK H. HAMILTON, M.D.,
ISAAC E. TAYLOR, M.D., R. FORDYCE BARKER, M.D.,
 ELISHA HARRIS, M.D., THADDEUS HALSTED, M.D.,
WM. C. ANDERSON, M.D., JARED LINSLEY, M.D.,
EDWARD DELAFIELD, M.D., J. T. METCALFE,M.D.,
JOSEPH M SMITH, M.D., GURDON BUCK, M.D.,
JOHN O. STONE, M.D., WM. M. BLAKEMAN, M.D.,
CHAS. HENSCHEL, M.D., JAMES ANDERSON,  M.D.
 
DEAR SIRS: 
    Our Association is deeply impressed with the importance of taking active steps in relation to the Sanitary Condition of our City. 
    At a meeting of the CITIZENS’ ASSOCIATION of New York, held on the 29th February, ult., the undersigned were appointed a Committee to address a Letter to Physicians, for the purpose of obtaining from the Medical Profession the fullest and most reliable information relative to the public health. Will you, at your earliest convenience, favor us with the desired information? 
    The importance of this subject to all classes can scarcely be over-estimated, as from the evidence already before this Association it appears that the excess of mortality is needless and alarming. 

        Very respectfully, yours, 

HAMILTON FISH,
JOHN DAVID WOLFE,
EDWARD S. JAFFRAY,
JOHN JACOB ASTOR, JR.,
JAMES M. BROWN, Committee appointed at a Meeting
JONATHAN STURGES of the Citizens' Association of
ROBERT B. ROOSEVELT New York, held February 29,
AUGUST BELMONT 1864.
CHARLES O'CONOR
NATHANIEL SANDS
CHARLES A. SECOR
MORRIS KETCHUM,
 
 
 

New York, March 9th, 1864.

THE COMMITTEE ON SANITARY INQUIRY, &c., 
OF THE CITIZENS’ ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK 

GENTLEMEN: 

    In replying to your letter of inquiry requesting information concerning the public health of this city, we would briefly state a few leading facts relating to the rate of mortality in this community, and also refer to some of the conditions of insalubrity among us. 
    The city of New York ought to be one of the most healthy cities in the world, for no other large city is favored with greater natural advantages of locality and climate, and probably no city has a greater influx of a vigorous and healthy population, from the rural districts and from foreign countries 
    But a fearfully HIGH DEATH-RATE prevails in this city. This is the sure criterion of the public health, and it is the most reliable test of the sanitary condition of any populous community Extensive observation proves that it is not difficult to state about what proportion of deaths in great cities may properly be attributed to PREVENTABLE DISEASES, and consequently what may be properly regarded as a necessary and inevitable rate of mortality in such a population. 
    The highest medical and statistical authorities of Europe have shown the propriety and importance of such estimations in vital statistics. 
    The total number of deaths in the city of New York, during the year 1863, according to the City Inspector’s returns, was 25,196! This is equal to one death in every thirty-five of the inhabitants, estimating the population of the city last year at 900,000. 
    According to Dr. E. M. Snow, the distinguished Health Officer of Providence, Rhode Island, the mortality in the following six neighboring cities, during the year 1863, may be stated as follows:

 
 
Estimated population
Deaths 1863
Of Population, 
one in
New York
900,000
25,196
35.7
Philadelphia
620,000
14,220
43.6
Boston
194,000
4,698
41.2
Newark, N.J.
85,000
1,952
43.5
Providence
55,000
1,214
45.3
Hartford
32,000
583
54.8
 
  It is not for us to state what the rate of mortality in New York should have been, under proper sanitary regulations, the past year, but we would present a few facts to show the results of improvements in sanitary government of great cities, which, with natural advantages of salubrity far inferior to those of New York, have been rescued from a condition of fearful insalubrity, and rendered far more healthful than our city now is. 
 
 
Previous to establishing a good Sanitary Government, the annual rate of Mortality was  The rate of Mortality in the same Cities, with the present system of Sanitary Government, has been 
In London 1 in 20 In London 1 in 45
In Liverpool 1 in 28 In Liverpool 1 in 44
In Philadelphia 1 in 39 In Philadelphia  1 in 44 to 1 in 57
In New York,  
at Present
1 in 35 + While in the City of New York the death-rate has increased from 1 in 46 1/2 (in the year 1810), to 1 in 35, at the present time
Do., average of last ten years 1 in 32 1/2
    Facts like these should arouse the attention of all persons who feel an interest in human welfare, or in the prosperity of our city. Yet we would point to the high death-rate that prevails in the city simply as a reliable index to the physical sufferings, the want, the neglect, the sickness, the orphanage and pauperism, with which such excessive mortality is always associated. 
    The fact that any considerable excess of mortality above a proper and inevitable death-rate, arises from causes that may and should be prevented by sanitary regulations, is now admitted by all intelligent physicians and social economists. 
    By means of suitable sanitary regulations, and a faithful and competent administration of such laws, the rate of mortality in this city ought to be very greatly reduced. The experience of other great cities, and the teachings of sanitary science, warrant the opinion that the present rate of mortality may be reduced fully THIRTY PER CENT. Such a reduction would save from 7,000 to 10,000 lives in this city during the present year. But the saving of this vast number of precious lives is not the only, nor is it the greatest, benefit that would result to the health and welfare of the city by means of suitable sanitary government. 
    It is a medical and statistical fact that for every death in a large community there are at least twenty-eight cases of sickness. This would give, in the population of our city, upwards of two hundred thousand cases of preventable and needless sickness every year! This conclusion is fully warranted by the statistics of our public charities, and by medical observation, and it is based upon broad inquiries and generalization respecting sickness and mortality in Great Britain, as stated by Dr Lyon Playfair, a distinguished authority in Hygiene. 
    It is a maxim in the medical profession that it is far easier to prevent disease than to cure it, and it certainly is far more economical to do so. And when we remember that the great excess of mortality and of sickness in our city occurs among the poorer classes of the population, and that such excessive unhealthiness and mortality is a most prolific source of physical and social want, demoralization and pauperism, the subject of needed sanitary reforms, in this crowded metropolis, assumes such important bearings and such a vast magnitude as to demand the most serious consideration of all persons who regard the welfare of their fellow-beings, or the best interests of the community. 
    We need not represent to you the great interest which every other city and town in our country has in the question of health and disease in this great emporium of commerce; nor need we, as physicians, speak of the official abuses that prevent sanitary improvement and good government. When pestilential diseases visit this city, the impotence of the existing sanitary system is confessed, and the people are panic-stricken, while the interests of commerce suffer by the insensible and certain loss of millions. 
    In the final report of the Aldermanic Committee on Public Health, of which Ex-Gov E D Morgan was the Chairman, in the cholera season of 1849, the fact is stated that "New York is destitute of a Sanitary Police worthy the name." Again, the chief officer of the so-called Sanitary Bureau of the City Government, in his annual report in the year 1861, asks: "How is this state of things, which marks with shame the great City of New York, to be remedied?" And he answers: "The power of remedy does not rest in me, nor in the departments over which I have the honor to preside." 
    Small-pox, and other infectious and loathsome diseases, are allowed to prevail and be diffused continually in all parts of the city; the worst causes of fevers and other fatal maladies are being continually generated in the crowded habitations of the poor; while from this, as a radiating centre of disease, the poisons of death that are so abundant here, are diffused widely throughout the entire country. 
    We will not extend this statement, but would conclude by saying that the sacredness of human life and the inestimable value of health are incentives that can be relied upon to secure the cooperation of all true physicians in your efforts to promote sanitary reforms. 
Respectfully, yours, 
VALENTINE MOTT, M.D., 1 Gramercy Park. 
WILLARD PARKER, M.D., 37 East 12th Street. 
ISAAC WOOD, M.D., 68 East 17th Street. 
JAMES R. WOOD, M.D., 2 Irving Place. 
JAMES ANDERSON, M.D., 30 University Place. 
JOHN H. GRISCOM, M.D., 42 East 29th Street. 
WM. C. ANDERSON, M.D., 3 Union Square. 
ISAAC E. TAYLOR, M.D., 13 West 20th Street. 
STEPHEN SMITH, M.D., 55 West 34th Street. 
EDWARD DELAFIELD, M.D., 2 East 17th Street. 
ELISHA HARRIS, M.D., 55 West 34th Street. 
JOSEPH M. SMITH, M.D., 11 East 17th Street. 
JOHN O. STONE, M.D., 27 East 23d Street. 
CHAS. HENSCHEL, M.D., 20 East 14th Street. 
E.> 

Transfer interrupted!

l. 
AUSTIN FLINT, M.D., 259 Fourth Avenue. 
FRANK H HAMILTON, M.D., Bellevue Hosp., Coll. 
CHAS. D. SMITH, M.D., 20 West 19th Street. 
B. FORDYCE BARKER, M.D., 75 Madison Ave. 
THADDEUS H. HALSTED, M.D., 42 West 23d Street. 
JARED LINSLY, M.D., 22 Lafayette Place. 
J. T. METCALFE, M.D., 34 East 14th Street. 
GURDON BUCK, M.D., 121 Tenth Street. 
WM N BLAKEMAN, M.D., 113 Tenth Street.
To HAMILTON FISH, ESQ., 
JOHN DAVID WOLFE, ESQ., 
EDWARD S. JAFFRAY, ESQ., 
JOHN JACOB ASTOR, JR., ESQ., 
AUGUST BELMONT, ESQ., 
CHARLES O’CONOR, ESQ., 
ROBERT B. ROOSEVELT, ESQ., 
CHARLES A. SECOR, ESQ., 
JONATHAN STURGES, ESQ., 
MORRIS KETCHUM, ESQ., 
JAMES M. BROWN, ESQ., 
NATHANIEL SANDS, ESQ. 
(Committee for Sanitary Inquiry, &c.)
 

Franklin’s aphorism that Public Health is Public Wealth, finds ample confirmation in the experience of all populous communities; and when our best medical men assure us that a vast proportion of the sickness in our city is produced by causes that are positively preventable, or that may be removed; and when they state the fact that the preventable waste of life and health, in the City of New York, may safely be estimated at sevem thousand lives, and more than two hundred thousand cases of sickness every year—shall not every citizen bestir himself to terminate such a waste of the richest physical blessings which the Creator has bestowed upon mankind?  "All that a man hath will he give for his life;" and yet, to society at large, the care and protection of life and health is a cumulative good, which confers benefits that multiply and extend like the good deeds of well-spent days. Sanitary improvements directly promote the material advancement of a people, while they bring into operation the most reliable and effectual agencies for social and moral elevation.

Their ultimate and highest results reach far beyond pecuniary advantage; they take deep hold upon the noblest sympathies and sentiments of all classes of society; they confer benefits upon all alike.

The relation of the health and vigorous life of a people to the State, or to commercial prosperity, requires no discussion in this statement. From Plato to the greatest of modern statesmen and economists, the sanitary welfare of a people has justly been deemed an essential element of social and commercial advancement; and so intimately related do we find the sanitary and the social wants of the population in the City of New York, that, from the outset of reformatory efforts, whether social and political or exclusively moral and religious, sanitary improvement is a work of paramount necessity. "There is," says the Edinburgh Review (vol. xci , 1850), "a most fatal connection between physical uncleanness and moral pollution. The condition of a population becomes invariably assimilated to that of their habitations. The indirect effects of sickness are far more hurtful, though less observable, than the direct effects of mortal disease; it lowers the tone, unstrings the nerves, and brings on physical languor and mental apathy."  But beyond the physical, the mental, and the economical losses resulting from prevailing ill-health, there are certain political and social aspects of the same agencies that ought to be studied by every intelligent citizen. The mobs that held fearful sway in our city during the memorable outbreak of violence in the month of July, 1863, were gathered in the overcrowded and neglected quarters of the city. As was stated by a leading journalist at that time:

    "The high brick blocks and closely-packed houses where the mobs originated seemed to be literally hives of sickness and vice. It was wonderful to see, and difficult to believe, that so much misery, disease, and wretchedness can be huddled together and hidden by high walls, unvisited and unthought of; so near our own abodes. Lewd but pale and sickly young women; scarcely decent in their ragged attire, were impudent and scattered everywhere in the crowd. But what numbers of these poorer classes are deformed! what numbers are made hideous by self-neglect and infirmity!
    "Alas! human faces look so hideous with hope and self-respect all gone! And female forms and features are made so frightful by sin, squalor and debasement! To walk the streets as we walked them, in those hours of conflagration and riot, was like witnessing the day of judgment, with every wicked thing revealed, every sin and sorrow blazingly glared upon, every hidden abom-ination laid before hell’s expectant fire…..
    “The elements of popular discord are gathered in those wretchedly-constructed tenant-houses, where poverty, dis-ease, and crime find an abode. Here disease in its most loathsome forms propagates itself. Unholy passions rule in the domestic circle. Every thing, within and without, tends to physical and moral degradation.”
In the Report of the Council of Hygiene will be found a body of evidence bearing upon the subject of Sanitary neglect as producing social degradation, which to readers and to legislators can scarcely be of less interest than the definite records and well-sustained conclusions therein contained respecting the existing sanitary condition and wants of the city, the preventable causes of disease, and the physical agencies and works required for the needed hygienic improvements.

It should be borne in mind that this preliminary labor of the Council of Hygiene and its corps of skilled and indefatigable Sanitary Inspectors, has been planned and performed voluntarily, and by gentlemen whose time and thoughts are burdened by their ordinary professional and official duties; and that none of the means or powers of the municipal government could be used in prosecuting the great work of inquiry and recording, which has, under peculiar disadvantages, but with marked success, been prosecuted by them.

The CITIZENS' ASSOCIATION asks the attention of the people of the City and the State of New York to the facts set forth in this Sanitary Report, and it also asks that the needed works of SANITARY IMPROVEMENT be immediately begun by competent minds and competent hands. The skilled labors and trustworthy advice of a Voluntary Council of Hygiene, have definitely determined when and how such works of improvement should be commenced. They have shown what is the nature, and what must be the preventive or cure of existing causes of needless sickness, mortality, and public peril from removable evils.

To the physicians who have thus contributed lasting benefits to the public welfare, their own fellow-citizens and society at large are placed under renewed obligations. And in thus requesting and obtaining from the Profession that is ever in the front ranks of all great enterprises for human improvement such labors and such practical results, the Association has simply done what the people in their legislative capacity are in duty bound to do. A popular writer has stated that “The State which founds its legislation on a knowledge of realities, which expects from the physical sciences information respecting human life collectively, considered in all its relations, has a right to demand from its physicians a gen-eral insight into the nature and causes of popular diseases.” [HECKER'S Epidemics of the Middle Ages; BABBINGTON’S EDITION.]

The Association cannot close this Introduction without expressing its grateful estimate of the arduous and self-denying labors of the medical gentlemen, the fruit of whose researches is embodied in the Report. An investigation so thorough, searching, and extensive, and directed by such genius and energy, has never before been attempted in our city or in this country. In pursuing their investigations they have not hesitated to sacrifice personal ease and comfort, and deny themselves many social enjoyments; they have exposed themselves to repulsive and nauseous scenes in the abodes of misery and want, and to the infectious localities and homes of disease and death, in order to be able to give an exact and complete survey of the sufferings, perils, and sanitary wants of the inhabitants of the crowded and insalubrious districts, and to secure the application of effective guarantees against future misery and death.

The Citizens’ Association having determined to initiate reformatory movements that shall produce permanently beneficial results, and having taken counsel with able advisers, presents to the public this Report of its Council of Hygiene and Public Health, believing that the various questions which are therein examined and elucidated are of vital importance to the sanitary, commercial, and social welfare of New York.

The Council of the Citizens' Association
JAMES BROWN, JOHN DAVID WOLF,
ALEX. T. STEWART, WM. E. DODGE,
JOHN JACOB ASTOR, Jr., ROBERT B. ROOSEVELT,
EDWARD S. JAFFRAY, JONATHAN STURGES,
PETER COOPER, JAMES M. BROWN,
WASHINGTON R. VERMILYE, EDWIN HOYT,
NATHANIEL SANDS, HAMILTON FISH,
J.F.D LANIER, JOHN C. GREEN,
CHAS. A. SECOR, JAS. BOORMAN JOHNSTON,
WM. M. VERMILYE, MORRIS KETCHUM.
 
NEW YORK, January, 1865.
Click here to see the report on the Fourth Ward
The Fourth Ward: 
Life and Death in New York, 1860-1870