Session 9 Commentary 


Agenda
Outsourcing
-- an overview: 
                      --Remaining students present the web page assigned to them:

Procurement  

Break

Financial Analysis

Remember: 
probability of an event occurring + probability of an event not occurring = 1 
so  if  probability of rain today is .8 then the probability of no rain = 1- .8 or .2.  


RFP  Request for Proposal -- aka RFQ Request for Quote

.. The Process                                    

 

1]  Pre-RFP aka as "Requirements Definition"

Preliminary Analysis for Management (not given to vendor) on the RFP
Process

Steps in the Pre-RFP

Sections of the Pre-RFP Report to management


2]  RFP -- for the vendors -- 

--  The sections of the Pre-RFP and the RFP (3 versions given)

--  The guidelines for assignment III - RFP


3]  Proposal Submissions


4] Proposal Evaluations

 

 


5] Vendor Selection


6] Procurement Methods


7] ROI Analysis  Return of Investment

Earnings on the investment / total investment = ROI

Therefore, while necessary to consider it is not necessary to come up with a solid ROI.


8] Contract Negotiation


.. Software Selection

Pre-Packaged Software

Customized Software

Custom Software Development

Turn-key Solutions



 

Break



Financial Analysis

Costs and Benefits Review

Analysis Methods are based on the-

Statement of Work -- agreement between firm and vendor --

Software Performance

Implementation

Technical Architecture

Training Strategy

Maintenance and Support

Cost Schedule


Situation in Statement of Work Analysis Method
project justified in terms of cost, not benefits     or
benefits do substantially improve with project
1.Break-even analysis
project improves tangible benefits 2. Payback analysis
project is expensive relative to firm size or large drain on funds 3. Cash-flow analysis
payback period is long or cost of borrowing money is high 4.Net Present Value analysis

Cost Benefit Analysis

1. Break-even Analysis -- justification from costs, not benefits, or if benefits do not substantially improve with the proposed system
---- compares total costs against growth in volume
The break even point is when the total cost of the current system and proposed system intersect, at this point it becomes "profitable."

Pro-- useful when business is growing, volume is key variable in cost
Con -- benefits are assumed to remain the same, regardless which system is in consideration

Exs.  Current payroll system costs $1.25 /ee to process an employee for a paycheck with 1000 employees.   The new system will process up to 4000 transactions at the cost of $.35 / ee and costs $20,000.   Payroll is processed weekly.

TCold = Total Cost of running old system
Q = number of employees processed

TCnew = .35Q + 20,000
TCold= $1.25Q 
Breakeven is when old costs = new costs therefore: TCold = TCnew

  .35Q +20000 = 1.25Q or .9Q=20000 or Q = 22,222 employees or 
22,222/1000 = the pay period in which breakeven is found or in the 23rd pay period, the break-even point is reached.  


2. Payback Method -- justification from improved tangible benefits
---- assess the worthiness of alternative investments in terms of time
---- length of time it takes for the benefit of the system to payback the cost of developing it.
---- determine the period of time of operation that system need  to payback the cost of investment.
---- Payback Period = Investment required / net annual cash inflow (that is, the benefits)

Pro -- gives the minimal period of time the system needs to be in operation to have system make "sense."
Con -- short term approach on investment & replacement
       -- does not consider how repayments are timed

       -- does not consider total return beyond the payback period

Exs. A new b2b system handles 1000 sales per day averaging $50 per sale or $50,000 per day after paying the variable costs.  It costs $300,000 to develop.  The payback period is 300,000 / 50,000 = 6 days for payback.

3. Cash Flow Analysis -- project is expensive relative to firm's size, or when firm can be significantly affected by large drain of funds
---- assess the direction, size and pattern of cash flow (both inflow and outflow).  
       If no revenue, only measure cash outlay
---- when will project begin to make profit or out of the red?

---- examines the direction, size and pattern of cash flow associated with the proposed systems

  Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
Rev   5k 3k 24.96k 31.27k
Costs 26k 27.4k 17.37k 18.67k 20.09k
Cashflow (21k) (74k) 7.59k 12.6k 18.93k
Cum CF (21k) (28.4k) (20.81k) (8.21k) 10.72k

4. Net Present Value -- payback period is long or cost of borrowing money is high
---- considers both the time value of the investments and cash flows.
---- assess all of the costs (outlays) and revenues over its economic life and to compare cost today with future costs; and today's benefits with future benefits so different project can be compared regardless of timing
-
--- concept of Present Value: $1 received today is more valuable than $1 a year from now which is more valuable $1 two years from now
The present $1 can be invested and earn 7% return or $1.07 in 1 year and $1.14 in 2 years and $1.23 in 3 years  (this is known as 'opportunity cost')
  
The future involves uncertainty-- the longer the time frame, the more uncertainty on what that $1 will earn

Money has a time value: managers must have a means of expressing future receipts in present dollar terms so the future receipt can be compared on an equal basis.
   
F1   = the amount to be received in 1 year = The future value at 1 year
   
Fn   = the future amount to be received in n periods = The future value at n year
   
p    = the present outlay to be made
    r    =  the rate of interest
    n   =  the number of periods
                     Future Value

   
F1= p(1+r) = 100(1+.07) = 107
   
Fn= p(1+r)n = 100(1+.07)4 = 100(1.3107) = 131.07 when n=4, r = 7% and p = 100
                    Present Value
   
p = Fn/ (1+r)n


  
                 Discounting or the value of future expected cash receipts and expenditures at a common date, which is calculated using Net Present Value or Internal Rate of Return (IRR).  It is a factor in analyses of capital investments.
the process of finding the present value of a future cash flow
discounting $110.25 to its present value of $100 ; 5% is the discount rate. 


Capital Budgeting