Some Non-Mathematical Proofs
The following is a list of some common proof techniques
that are often extremely useful.
- Proof by example:
The author gives only the case n = 2 and suggests that it contains most of
the ideas of the general proof.
- Proof by intimidation:
'Trivial.'
- Proof by vigorous handwaving:
Works well in a classroom or seminar setting.
- Proof by cumbersome notation:
Best done with access to at least four alphabets and special symbols.
- Proof by exhaustion:
An issue or two of a journal devoted to your proof is useful.
- Proof by omission:
'The reader may easily supply the details.'
'The other 253 cases are analogous.'
'...'
- Proof by obfuscation:
A long plotless sequence of true and/or meaningless syntactically related statements.
- Proof by wishful citation:
The author cites the negation, converse, or generalization of a theorem
from literature to support his claims.
- Proof by funding:
How could three different government agencies be wrong?
- Proof by eminent authority:
'I saw Karp in the elevator and he said it was probably NP-complete.'
- Proof by personal communication:
'Eight-dimensional colored cycle stripping is NP-complete [Karp, personal communication].'
- Proof by reduction to the wrong problem:
' To see that infinite-dimensional colored cycle stripping is decidable,
we reduce it to the halting problem.'
- Proof by reference to inaccessible literature:
The author cites a simple corollary of a theorem to be found in a privately circulated
memoir of the Slovenian Philological Society, 1883.
- Proof by importance:
A large body of useful consequences all follow from the proposition in question.
- Proof by accumulated evidence:
Long and diligent search has not revealed a counterexample.
- Proof by cosmology:
The negation of the proposition is unimaginable or meaningless.
Popular for proofs of the existence of God.
- Proof by mutual reference:
In reference A, Theorem 5 is said to follow from Theorem 3 in reference B,
which is shown from Corollary 6.2 in reference C, which is an easy consequence of Theorem 5
in reference A.
- Proof by metaproof:
A method is given to construct the desired proof.
The correctness of the method is proved by any of these techniques.
- Proof by picture:
A more convincing form of proof by example. Combines well with proof by omission.
- Proof by vehement assertion:
It is useful to have some kind of authority in relation to the audience.
- Proof by ghost reference:
Nothing even remotely resembling the cited theorem appears in the reference given.
- Proof by forward reference:
Reference is usually to a forthcoming paper of the author, which is often not as forthcoming as at first.
- Proof by semantic shift:
Some standard but inconvenient definitions are changed for the statement of the result.
- Proof by appeal to intuition:
Cloud-shaped drawings frequently help here.