October 3, 1997

 

To the University Community:

DePaul University, as it prepares to celebrate its centennial, has the opportunity to establish its position nationally and internationally as a university that is making a difference--a difference to each individual who is part of the university community and a difference to the people and institutions of the larger society, especially those of greater Chicago.

The vision for DePaul, as stated in the 1995 Strategic Plan, is to become a nationally and internationally recognized Aurban force@ by building on its strengths as a university and as one that is Vincentian. DePaul=s reputation is a result of the quality and visibility of its many and diverse academic programs, the scholarship of its faculty, and the programmatic manifestations that reflect DePaul=s Catholic, Vincentian and urban character. This character shapes its primary mission of teaching and learning; the integration of teaching, scholarship and service; the support for the professional and personal development of students, staff and faculty; and the service we provide one another and our external constituencies. DePaul=s urban character makes it an active participant in the life of the community of greater Chicago, both drawing on and contributing to its people and institutions.

During the past three years, we have set a strategic direction for the university and been responsive to many opportunities that have enhanced and manifested our mission. We, as a community, have worked aggressively to move from a position of being financially leveraged to a position of financial strength. We have controlled expenditures, reallocated resources, increased our assets, and invested our scarce dollars carefully. Although we have made progress in working more efficiently and more collaboratively, we still face future challenges.

Implementing the Centennial phase of the Strategic Plan gives DePaul an opportunity to achieve greatness. This can be truly an exciting time for us. The enhancement and expansion of our academic mission will complement the new facilities that are being constructed or planned. This will require the setting of priorities and establishing time lines and measurements.

We are pleased with the leadership of the deans and vice presidents in the selection of the ten Centennial Initiatives. In the coming months, the larger university community will be involved in developing and implementing the action plans to support the initiatives.

As we move forward, we need to keep in mind the words of St. Vincent dePaul: AIt is not enough to do good. It must be done well.@ The proposed plan will allow DePaul to do its work well.

 

Richard J. Meister Kenneth McHugh

Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs Executive Vice President

 

 

 

Rev. John P. Minogue, C.M.

President

STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS

The Centennial Phase

 

1997-1999

Two years ago, the Board of Trustees approved the 1995 Strategic Plan. The Plan provided a vision; described the current state of society, higher education, and DePaul; and identified a number of opportunities available to move DePaul toward its vision. It did not establish priorities among the potential initiatives, time-lines or measurements. Since that time, the university has had many successes as well as some failures, and the future of higher education in America is becoming clearer. Now is the opportunity to build on the successes and to identify specific goals and related strategies to insure our future role in higher education. Among the many recent successes, the ones that most impact the university as a whole are:

 

C the very positive report of the NCA visiting team, which led to the continuation of DePaul=s accreditation on August 13, 1997;

C enrollment growth: 3.2% in 1995-96; 1.4% in 1996-97; and an increase of 2%+ in 1997-98;

C the implementation of the first phase of a new liberal studies program, including Discover Chicago and the focal point seminars;

C initiatives in distance learning; the opening of the Naperville campus, the offering of the MBA in Hong Kong; interactive video and Internet courses;

C successful completion of the first year (1996-97) of the Five Year Financial Plan;

C significant growth in the endowment during the past two years;

C substantial external funding for the McGowan Biological and Environmental Science building and the renovation of the College of Law;

C a $1.5 million, five-year grant for Title III and a $700,000, four-year grant for Title IV;

C over $15 million in external grants and contracts in 1996-97 to support outreach and partnership programs for the larger community.

These successes and a clearer sense of trends affecting the larger society make it possible for us to Athink big@ as we envision this university in the year 2007.

A year ago, coming out of discussions of the ideas of the late Ernest Boyer at the summer planning retreat, especially his call for higher education to truly be a public good, Dick Meister wrote of DePaul becoming the ANew American University,@ that is a university where teaching is primary, research is broadly defined, and a synergy exists with the larger society of which it is a part. During this past year, the discussions with the executive team and the Joint Council resulted in the proposing of three academic goals and the restatement of the strategic financial goal as a fourth institutional goal:

1. To provide all full-time students a holistic education that will foster extraordinary learning opportunities through a highly diverse faculty, staff and student body; extensive use of technology; a wide range of high-quality out-of-classroom learning experiences that engage faculty, staff, and students in the learning process; and an undergraduate curriculum founded on a strong liberal arts core, that enables all students to achieve the ten learning goals.

2. To be a nationally and internationally recognized provider of the highest quality professional education for adult, part-time students, and to be the dominant provider in the greater Chicago area.

 3. To research, develop, deliver and transfer innovative, educationally related programs and services that have a significant social impact and give concrete expression to the university=s Vincentian mission.

4. To move from a financially leveraged position to a position of financial strength (implemented as of July 1, 1996).

The proposed goals formed the agenda for the three summer planning meetings: the June 19 meeting which focused on community-based learning; the July 17-18 academic planning retreat; and the president=s retreat in August. In many ways the three academic goals give coherence to much of what we are already doing or intending to do; however, they also represent a call for bold action and an acceleration of our strategic planning.

The first goal, providing a holistic education for the full-time undergraduate and graduate/law student, is based on the assumptions that for the next three to five years, DePaul will not seek to increase significantly the size of this student constituency and must be aggressive to maintain the present size. Key factors in this decision to support minimal growth are: a) the financial pressures caused by growth of full-time students on the operating budget; and b) lack of, science, recreation and student support facilities on the Lincoln Park campus.

Recently, we have implemented a number of exciting initiatives that support the first goal, including: a new Liberal Studies program (the Discover Chicago program and focal point seminars), the increase in international and multicultural experiences, the expansion of experiential/service learning opportunities, the enhancement and linking of academic and career advising; and the integration of technology into the learning environment. The major challenge we face in recruiting and retaining full-time students is to remain ahead of our competitors by providing an affordable, high quality education. Given the limited financial resources of many of our students, the limit to which we can allocate institutionally-funded aid and the growing concern in society about the affordability and cost of higher education, we need to look seriously at ways to integrate student work experiences into our degree programs, to expand Alearn and earn@ opportunities, and to provide an effective student and career development support system. At the June retreat, many of us at the luncheon were deeply moved by the reflections of the six alumni on their experiential and service learning experiences. For the six students, these experiences reinforced traditional learning and motivated them to acquire knowledge and skills. Their experiences helped them to clarify their personal and career goals.

The second goal is two fold--achieving national and international recognition as a provider of professional education for the part-time student and becoming the dominant provider of professional education in the greater Chicago area. To accomplish this goal will require bold action. The key assumptions are: a) increasing the size of this constituency is critical to our long-term financial strength; and b) future growth is not limited by the cost of new facilities or infrastructure. Our past success in serving this student constituency is due to responding quickly in developing new programs that meet social needs and to making these programs accessible.

This success in serving the part-time student is reflected in the national and international recognition of our Graduate School of Business, the School for New Learning, and the College of Law, as well as the growing strength of the School of Computer Science, Telecommunications and Information Systems. Thus, such recognition results from our success in the greater Chicago area and contributes to this success. The implementation of a suburban strategy and becoming an efficient provider of distance education are key strategies to achieving this second goal. A major challenge facing us is how to create a faculty culture that remains collegial and is able to deliver the courses and programs in a multi-campus environment.

The adoption and implementation of the third goal--to research, develop, deliver and transfer innovative, educationally related programs and services that have a significant social impact and give concrete expression to the university=s Vincentian mission--can be as strategic for us for the next ten years as enrollment growth has been for the last decade. The third goal is based on the assumptions that a) society believes that education and training are key agents of social change; b) our recent experience demonstrates that there is a market demand for such programs; and c) these programs must increase three to five fold in five years. These educationally related programs will manifest our Vincentian and urban character and will be integral in defining DePaul as a university. DePaul=s mission as a university will be built upon three equal, educational goals that would form a tripod, with each mutually supporting the other two. Taken together, these goals will redefine DePaul as a university for the 21st century.

The external programs that support Goal III must have significant potential to enhance the first two goals. Programs such as STEP, McPrep, the Alliance Minority Participation (AMP), the Science Preparatory Institute (SPI), and SAS (Student Achievement Structure), as well as the work of the Center for Urban Education and the Office of Applied Innovations, are creating educational pipelines to insure future pools of qualified students for admission to DePaul=s degree programs. DePaul=s commitment to the public schools of greater Chicago is resulting in increased enrollments in the School of Education, attracting high school graduates and Chicago teachers. These programs also receive significant support from major foundations and corporations, thus strengthening DePaul=s credibility and reputation. These and other programs are providing students with learning, earning and career opportunities and support faculty scholarship/research and teaching.

Some additional examples of programs that have benefitted the whole institution include, first, the West Humboldt Park/DePaul Community Partnership, funded through a Housing and Urban Development grant to the Egan Urban Center, involves faculty and students from the departments of Management and Psychology, the School of Education, and the Management of Public Services program, and also provides service and tutorial opportunities through the DePaul Community Service Association. Second, the faculty and departments of the College of Commerce have received a number of grants to provide business-related education and training to business and government representatives from Eastern and Central Europe and from Asia. Faculty who have participated in these programs have enhanced their own teaching and broadened their research agendas. And in some cases these programs have increased international learning opportunities for students. Finally, the International Human Rights Law Institute has received over the past four years grants from foundations and contracts from the federal government to deliver educationally related programs. Although these programs involved the training of international lawyers and judges, they also involved our faculty and students.

 In July, at the request of Fr. Minogue, Ken McHugh and Dick Meister, Charles Strain, professor of Religious Studies, agreed to facilitate the planning retreats and to direct the next phase of the strategic planning process. The discussions, recommendations, and critiques of the July academic planning retreat, which was open to all faculty and staff, created the agenda for the president=s retreat in August. This retreat resulted in an acceptance of the three goals and the identification of ten initiatives, hereafter called Centennial Initiatives, to support these goals. The Centennial Initiatives represent our first steps towards reshaping DePaul for its second century.

This autumn, task forces or committees composed of individuals from the academic and operational units most central to or most affected by each initiative will be established. The groups will be responsible for recommending action plans including measurements, time lines, and identifying individuals and offices responsible for their successful implementation. Faculty, staff and students will have the opportunity to participate in this process. Your role is critical; some will be involved in the developing of action plans; all will be involved in implementing them. We need your support. Vice presidents, deans and members of the Joint Council have committed themselves to this process. Some of these individuals are listed as Achampions@ under specific initiatives, indicating a special responsibility. The stakeholders for each initiative, though a tentative listing, represent offices which are critical to its successful implementation.

Whenever possible, we will use existing committees or institutional structures to develop and/or implement the action plans. This will reduce duplication and conserve our energies. Some of the Centennial Initiatives are already in process and will be enhanced through the development of action plans. Others will require a period of preparation to allow time to plan and to solicit as many views as possible. Time will be built into the process for institutional discussion of the action plans with the opportunity for revision as we move forward. The initiatives will have staggered deadlines. The specific charges attached to each initiative will, of course, expand and become clarified during the process.

As we move forward we will continue to exercise fiscal discipline and restraint. Each planning team will establish priorities in developing the action plans that support each initiative. The action plans will both support and be supported by the fourth goal, that is, to move the university from a financially leveraged position to one of financial strength. To implement the action plans will require resources. Through the planning process, we will identify ways to leverage more effectively existing resources and continue to reallocate human and fiscal resources. The enrollment growth called for in the second goal will generate discretionary dollars. These funds will be invested in the enhancement of quality and in supporting the University=s goals. The plan will allow the university to make these investments more strategically. To accomplish the third goal, we will require that the activities that flow from this goal become self-sustaining financially and provide learning/research opportunities for degree-seeking students and for faculty. More importantly, the third goal, based on current experience, will significantly contribute to DePaul=s visibility and reputation, resulting in increasing external support for the larger mission of the university.

 In 1996-1997 we had the opportunity to reflect on our progress over the past ten years. Through this, the second phase of the 1995 Strategic Plan, we can insure that the progress over the next ten years will be as great. Those who will be responsible for preparing for the 2007 accreditation visit will look back with pride that the university made the decision to continue its tradition of boldness in 1997-1998.

Goal I

Goal I Matrix

 

Statement of Goal: To provide all full-time students a holistic education that will foster extraordinary learning opportunities through a highly diverse faculty, staff and student body; extensive use of technology; a wide range of high quality out-of-classroom learning experiences that engages faculty, staff, and students in the learning process; and an undergraduate curriculum, founded on a strong liberal arts core, that enables all students to achieve the ten learning goals.

 

 

Initiatives

 

Clarification of Charges

 

Champion(s)

 

Stakeholders

 

Possible Measures

 

1. Implementing the Liberal Studies Program to provide the spine of a holistic education

 

Requires an action plan that supports the current efforts of the Liberal Studies Council. While various activities are already underway, there is a great need for university-wide collaboration to implement the four-year program.

 

The action plan should address:

 

Cthe resources necessary to sustain the program since it involves a higher degree of cooperation among the colleges/schools with Student Affairs.

Cstructural and financial issues which must be resolved to insure cooperation across units.

Cthe relationship of the Liberal Studies Program to efforts to internationalize education and to apply technological resources for curricular enhancement (cf. Goal I/5)

Cexperiential learning (cf. Goal I/3 and III/2)

Clinkages with Goal I/4 through capstone experience

Ccreation of a faculty development plan around the multicultural seminar (cf. Goal I/2).

Ccreation of a plan to market the new liberal studies program as the centerpiece of a holistic undergraduate education

Cimplementation of assessment model.

 

 

Michael Mezey

 

Liberal Studies Council

 

Academic Affairs

 

Student Affairs

 

Deans= Council

 

Enrollment Management

 

Department Chairs

 

QIC

 

Internship Directors

 

Outcomes assessment which includes perspectives from:

 

CStudents

CFaculty

CEmployers

CAlumni

 

First year retention rates

 

Formal assessments of First Year Program

Goal I Matrix

 

Statement of Goal: To provide all full-time students a holistic education that will foster extraordinary learning opportunities through a highly diverse faculty, staff and student body; extensive use of technology; a wide range of high quality out-of-classroom learning experiences that engages faculty, staff, and students in the learning process; and an undergraduate curriculum, founded on a strong liberal arts core, that enables all students to achieve the ten learning goals.

 

 

Initiatives

 

Clarification of Charges

 

Champion(s)

 

Stakeholders

 

Possible Measures

 

2. Enhancing our commitment to diversity to ensure it permeates all endeavors within the learning community.

 

(Same as Initiative 4 for Goal II)

 

We must determine the institution=s commitment to diversity and how it is manifested in the learning community and create objectives that are both meaningful and transformative for students, faculty, and staff.

The action plan should address:

Cprioritizing and implementing the findings of previous investigations of diversity at DePaul (MIC and Pope Studies), including the recommendations for human resources.

Cevaluating past actions and building upon successes.

Cincluding the international dimension as part of the scope of diversity.

Cdeveloping mechanisms through which conflicts over issues of diversity are resolved within the university.

Cdeveloping a clearing house for information about activities focused on issues of diversity.

Ccoordinating different units of the university which focus on issues of cultural diversity.

Cstrengthening the office of the Special Assistant to the President for Diversity and other agencies responsible for implementing these prioritized recommendations.

Ccreating faculty development opportunities to enhance curricular materials and pedagogical approaches to reflect diversity.

Ccreating a faculty development plan around the multicultural seminar (cf. Goal I/1).

Cdeveloping strategies for using QIC/URC funds for the study of and the implementation of multicultural curricula in all colleges and schools.

 

Maryam Ahmad

 

Barbara Speicher

Barbara Sizemore

Michael Mezey

 

Deans

 

Department chairs

Administrative directors

Multicultural Student Affairs

Human Resources

Special Assistant to the President for Diversity

International Program Committee

 

Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs

 

QIC

 

URC

 

Residence Life

 

Recruitment, retention and graduation of diverse students.

Recruitment of diverse faculty, staff and administrators.

Staff satisfaction.

Student satisfaction and longitudinal change

 

Numbers of course offerings across the university that deal with cultural diversity

 

Numbers of QIC funded proposals which have a multicultural focus

Goal I Matrix

 

Statement of Goal: To provide all full-time students a holistic education that will foster extraordinary learning opportunities through a highly diverse faculty, staff and student body; extensive use of technology; a wide range of high quality out-of-classroom learning experiences that engages faculty, staff, and students in the learning process; and an undergraduate curriculum, founded on a strong liberal arts core, that enables all students to achieve the ten learning goals.

 

 

Initiatives

 

Clarification of Charges

 

Champion(s)

 

Stakeholders

 

Possible Measures

 3. Making a quality private education financially accessible.

(Implications for Goal II as well).

Work on this initiative is important because of our mission commitment to making education financially accessible to a wide range of students.

 Our action plan should consider:

 Chow DePaul can attain a competitive advantage and enrich students= educational experiences through Alearn and earn@ opportunities such as internships and other work linkages.

Chow DePaul can attain competitive advantage by exploring alternative degree programs, such as a 3 year degree, 5 year coop degree, 5 year double degree, etc.

Chow we provide personal counseling to assist students/families in financial planning.

Chow current aid structure affects the diversity of the student body.

Chow debt load affects students= career choices (cf. Goal I/4).

Chow to coordinate financial aid, student employment, internship, coop, and alternative pricing strategies.

 Jim Doyle

Susan Wallace

David Kalsbeek

Nathan Kelly

 Enrollment Management (Admissions, Financial Aid, Career Development)

Student Development

Student Affairs

Financial Accounts

Alumni Relations

College Internship Offices

Department Internships

Human Resources

Student Employment Office

Associate Deans (LA&S, Commerce & CTI)

 Enrollment

Student demographics

Numbers of earn/learn opportunities

Numbers of students who take advantage of opportunities offered by implemented changes

Collection data

Debt loads of graduates

Default rates on loans

Dropouts for financial reasons

 

 

Goal I Matrix

 

Statement of Goal: To provide all full-time students a holistic education that will foster extraordinary learning opportunities through a highly diverse faculty, staff and student body; extensive use of technology; a wide range of high quality out-of-classroom learning experiences that engages faculty, staff, and students in the learning process; and an undergraduate curriculum, founded on a strong liberal arts core, that enables all students to achieve the ten learning goals.

 

 

Initiatives

 

Clarification of Charges

 

Champion(s)

 

Stakeholders

 

Possible Measures

 4. Creating and sustaining an effective preparation for post-graduate experience (i.e., career development, graduate school guidance, alumni networks).

(cf. Linkages with Goals I/3, II/2, and III/2).

 Action plans for Initiative 4 should address:

 

Cthe integration of specialized training in the major with career guidance/preparation and practical learning experiences in potential workplaces (e.g., internships, coop experiences and practicums).

Cthe use of alumni networks to enhance the learning process of our students, as well as providing links for career development.

Copportunities for alumni to reconnect with DePaul which may ultimately enhance institutional spirit, loyalty and alumni giving

Chow to use community-based learning experiences to prepare for a wider range of careers and to enhance career choice, e.g., service learning opportunities as linked to training for careers in service (connects with Goal III/2).

Cthe development of systematic campaigns to assist students in gaining admission to graduate and professional programs and in gaining employment in their chosen fields.

Cthe development of a coordinated effort focused on the student=s development around this issue from Premier DePaul to graduation.

Cthe development of linkages between career preparation and academic advisement.

Cmultiple ways to maintain relationships with the primary employers of our students/alums (cf. Goal II/2).

David Kalsbeek

Teree Foster

Jack Lane

Jim Looney

College Offices

Alumni Relations

Career Development

Internship Offices

Alumni Council

Honors Program

Numbers and variety of internship and practicum opportunities

Student placement

Statistics on alumni involvement in the institution

Alumni giving

Student satisfaction measures

Improved retention

Grad/Prof school acceptance rates

Goal I Matrix

 

Statement of Goal: To provide all full-time students a holistic education that will foster extraordinary learning opportunities through a highly diverse faculty, staff and student body; extensive use of technology; a wide range of high quality out-of-classroom learning experiences that engages faculty, staff, and students in the learning process; and an undergraduate curriculum, founded on a strong liberal arts core, that enables all students to achieve the ten learning goals.

 

 

Initiatives

 

Clarification of Charges

 

Champion(s)

 

Stakeholders

 

Possible Measures

 5. Using technology to enhance the students= curricular and non-curricular needs.

(same as Initiative 3 for Goal III).

 Requires an action plan which develops innovative pedagogical approaches using technologies to enable the learner to fulfill his/her educational aspirations.

The action plan should address:

 Cthe transformation of DePaul=s culture to integrate technology in appropriate ways

Csupport of departmental and college-based programs to integrate technology into the curriculum.

Cdistance learning technologies as a mechanism for expanding international outreach.

Cimplementation of a faculty development program and the continuance of the Executive Staff Personal Computing Program

Cnetworking all classrooms and equipping them with up-to-date technologies.

Cthe maintenance of the balance between DePaul=s movement towards technological development and its commitment to personal interaction in the process of learning.

Cthe development of methods to keep university officers apprised of strategic possibilities enabled by technological developments.

 LoriLee Sadler

Susanne Dumbleton

David Justice

 Student and Career Development

Student Affairs

Lifelong Learning

Library Services

Process Facilitation Team

Academic Technology Development

ITAAG

International Program Committee

 Outcomes assessment which include perspectives from:

 CStudents

CFaculty

CEmployers

CAlumni

CStaff

GOAL II

Goal II Matrix

 

Statement of Goal: To be a nationally and internationally recognized provider of the highest quality professional education for adult, part-time students; and to be the dominant provider in the greater Chicago area.

 

 

Initiatives

 

Clarification of Charges

 

Champion(s)

 

Stakeholders

 

Possible Measures

 1. Creating a metropolitan presence.

 If we are to be recognized as the dominant provider of adult, part-time education and the first choice for quality and accessibility by prospective adult learners, we will need to develop a metropolitan presence.

The action plan should address:

Cthe implications of a strategy focused on a metropolitan presence for all university operations, services, resources and personnel.

Cthe development of a marketing strategy that clearly articulates our intent to serve the entire metropolitan area.

Clinkages between the metropolitan strategy and the enhancement of diversity.

Cdevelopment of multiple learning communities on and across multiple campuses.

Csuperior access to and delivery of appropriate support services to adult learners on multiple campuses.

Cthe inclusion of existing and new certificate programs as one means of establishing presence.

Cthe establishment of a metropolitan presence beyond campuses using other mechanisms (e.g., distance learning, worksite programs).

Cthe development of strategies to make sure that the university=s diversity goals, especially in terms of recruitment of faculty and students, are met on all campuses (cf. Goal I/2 and Goal II/4).

Cthe development of multiple ways of maintaining academic quality, collegiality and communal well-being when pursuing a multiple campus strategy.

Cthe development of criteria and processes for the selection of the location for new campuses and the development of their facilities that take into consideration such quality of life issues as proximity to multiple forms of transportation and spaces for communal gathering.

Cthe gathering of information necessary to make Informed decisions about which programs should be developed on which campuses.

 David Justice

Ronald Patten

Susanne Dumbleton

David Kalsbeek

Suburban Initiative Task Group

Initial Advisory Group for West Campus

Faculty/Student/

Staff User Groups

Adult Admissions

Deans

University Advancement

Student Affairs

Enrollment trends at all sites

Tracking of home/work location for students attending different campuses

Student/Staff/Faculty satisfaction

Cost data for different modes and locations of delivery

Employer satisfaction surveys

Public perceptions

 

Goal II Matrix

 

Statement of Goal: To be a nationally and internationally recognized provider of the highest quality professional education for adult, part-time students; and to be the dominant provider in the greater Chicago area.

 

 

Initiatives

 

Clarification of Charges

 

Champion(s)

 

Stakeholders

 

Possible Measures

2. Establishing professional networks

(cf. Linkages with Goal I/4).

 To establish a structure that supports a strategy of corporate network partnerships with corporations, not-for-profit organizations and other institutions that can be providers of future students, supporters of the university, sources of internship possibilities and employers of alumni and future graduates.

The action plan should address:

 Cfostering, coordinating and leveraging the external activities of various university units, including placement, enrollment, alumni relations, lifelong learning and advancement.

Cestablishing corporate contacts and gradually forming partnerships.

Cusing professional partnerships and networks comprised of stakeholders to review curricula and to develop new curricular possibilities, including non-degree as well as degree programs.

Cdeveloping a plan that increases faculty and student interaction with professional practitioners, including alumni, within individual courses and programs.

Cdeveloping an information system that will enable us to coordinate multiple connections with corporate partners.

 Jim Looney

David Kalsbeek

David Justice

Ronald Patten

 Deans

University Advancement

Enrollment Management (Admissions)

Alumni Relations

Career Placement

Lifelong Learning

Internship Offices

Corporate and Professional Advisory Councils

 Employer Tuition Reimbursement

Corporate Partnerships

Corporate giving

Placement of graduates

Degree of alumni involvement

Numbers of courses/events that involve professional practitioners

Goal II Matrix

 

Statement of Goal: To be a nationally and internationally recognized provider of the highest quality professional education for adult, part-time students; and to be the dominant provider in the greater Chicago area.

 

 

Initiatives

 

Clarification of Charges

 

Champion(s)

 

Stakeholders

 

Possible Measures

 3. Using technology to enhance the students= curricular and non-curricular needs.

(same as Initiative 5 for Goal I)

 Requires an action plan which develops innovative pedagogical approaches using technologies to enable the learner to fulfill his/her educational aspirations.

The action plan should address:

 Cthe transformation of DePaul=s culture to integrate technology in appropriate ways

Csupport of departmental and college-based programs to integrate technology into the curriculum.

Cdistance learning technologies as a mechanism for expanding international outreach.

Cimplementation of a faculty development program and the continuance of the Executive Staff Personal Computing Program

Cnetworking all classrooms and equipping them with up-to-date technologies.

Cthe maintenance of the balance between DePaul=s movement towards technological development and its commitment to personal interaction in the process of learning.

Cthe development of methods to keep university officers apprised of strategic possibilities enabled by technological developments.

LoriLee Sadler

Susanne Dumbleton

David Justice

Student and Career Development

Student Affairs

Lifelong Learning

Library Services

Process Facilitation Team

Academic Technology Development

ITAAG

International Program Committee

 Outcomes assessment which include perspectives from:

CStudents

CFaculty

CEmployers

CAlumni

CStaff

Goal II Matrix

 

Statement of Goal: To be a nationally and internationally recognized provider of the highest quality professional education for adult, part-time students; and to be the dominant provider in the greater Chicago area.

 

 

Initiatives

 

Clarification of Charges

 

Champion(s)

 

Stakeholders

 

Possible Measures

 4. Enhancing our commitment to diversity to ensure it permeates all endeavors within the learning community.

(same as Initiative 2 for Goal I)

 We must determine the institution=s commitment to diversity and how it is manifested in the learning community and create objectives that are both meaningful and transformative for students, faculty, and staff.

The action plan should address:

 Cprioritizing and implementing the findings of previous investigations of diversity at DePaul (MIC and Pope Studies), including the recommendations for human resources.

Cevaluating past actions and building upon successes.

Cincluding the international dimension as part of the scope of diversity.

Cdeveloping mechanisms through which conflicts over issues of diversity are resolved within the university.

Cdeveloping a clearing house for information about activities focused on issues of diversity.

Ccoordinating different units of the university which focus on issues of cultural diversity.

Cstrengthening the office of the Special Assistant to the President for Diversity and other agencies responsible for implementing these prioritized recommendations.

Ccreating faculty development opportunities to enhance curricular materials and pedagogical approaches to reflect diversity.

Ccreating a faculty development plan around the multicultural seminar (cf. Goal I/1).

Cdeveloping strategies for using QIC/URC funds for the study of and the implementation of multicultural curricula in all colleges and schools.

Maryam Ahmad

Barbara Speicher

Barbara Sizemore

Michael Mezey

Deans

Department chairs

Administrative directors

Multicultural Student Affairs

Human Resources

Special Assistant to the President for Diversity

International Program Committee

 

Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs

QIC

URC

Residence Life

Recruitment, retention and graduation of diverse students.

Recruitment of diverse faculty, staff and administrators.

Staff satisfaction.

Student satisfaction and longitudinal change

Numbers of course offerings across the university that deal with cultural diversity

Numbers of QIC funded proposals which have a multicultural focus

GOAL III

Goal III Matrix

 

Statement of Goal: To research, develop, deliver and transfer innovative, educationally related programs and services that will have significant social impact and will give concrete expression to the university=s Vincentian mission.

 

 

Initiatives

 

Clarification of Charges

 

Champion(s)

 

Stakeholders

 

Possible Measures

 1. Increasing the level of Goal III activities by expanding the focus and activities of current institutes, centers and projects and by creating new programs.

 Develop an action plan that seeks to:

 Ccreate support mechanisms (incubator) for those seeking to create new programs.

Cdevelop a start-up grant/revolving loan fund or a similar self-sustaining mechanism for new projects/initiatives.

Cencourage faculty participation in educationally related activities.

Cbenchmark competitors= partnerships with communities and corporations.

Cdevelop policies and financial performance guidelines for Goal III activities.

Cidentify, pilot and test new types of activities.

Cincrease number of current types of activities.

Cincrease community partnerships that drive these activities.

Cincrease activities through coordination of efforts among centers, institutes and programs.

Cdevelop a plan to publicize expanded activities.

Susanne Dumbleton

Barbara Sizemore

David Justice

Directors of Institutes, Centers and Projects

Academic Affairs

University Advancement; Corporate and Foundation Relations

University Relations

Increased program funding from government, corporations and private agencies

Define and monitor movement in the indicators of social impact

Goal III Matrix

 

Statement of Goal: To research, develop, deliver and transfer innovative, educationally related programs and services that will have significant social impact and will give concrete expression to the university=s Vincentian mission.

 

 

Initiatives

 

Clarification of Charges

 

Champion(s)

 

Stakeholders

 

Possible Measures

 2. Enriched learning opportunities for students and faculty through curricular integration of community-based learning projects.

 Goal I and Goal II are necessary but not sufficient to move DePaul forward. Goal III provides the sufficiency through its synergy with Goal I, Goal II and with the larger community.

The action plan should address:

 Cthe linkage of service and learning as part of DePaul=s Vincentian mission.

Cthe role of institutes, centers and projects for providing students with curricular and co-curricular opportunities for community-based learning.

Cinfrastructure and staffing necessary to support community-based learning.

Cpossible linkages with international programs and opportunities.

Cfinancial aid strategies (e.g., LA&S Public Service Scholarships) to enable students to do community-based learning and service learning projects.

Charles Strain

Susanne Dumbleton

Michael Mezey

Jim Doyle

 Faculty representatives from each college/school

Student Affairs

DCSA

Internship Directors

University Ministry

Public Services Program

QIC/URC

Career Development

Service Learning Committee

International Program Committee

Public Service Council

Liberal Studies Council

 Monitor movement in indicators of DePaul=s distinction from its competitors.

Earned reputation as the fourth Catholic university in America; perceived separation from the Aother Catholic universities@ group.

Monitor movement in indicators that the educational experience is transformative for both the student and society.

Goal III Matrix

 

Statement of Goal: To research, develop, deliver and transfer innovative, educationally related programs and services that will have significant social impact and will give concrete expression to the university=s Vincentian mission.

 

 

Initiatives

 

Clarification of Charges

 

Champion(s)

 

Stakeholders

 

Possible Measures

 3. Creating an institutional infrastructure that will support the achievement of Goal III

 Develop an action plan which provides a supportive infrastructure that addresses the following needs:

 Cto develop evaluative processes that ensure program quality.

Cto build awareness and support in the university community for activities related to Goal III.

Cto increase involvement of faculty and students in specific programs and projects.

Cto offer a flexible human resource plan that supports the accomplishments of Goal III.

Cto develop appropriate indirect cost models.

Cto develop long-term financial planning for these activities to insure that overall direct costs are covered by external funding and the appropriate indirect costs are covered and, were appropriate, funds are secured for future expansion of efforts.

Cto develop an informational database and a clearing house for all programs and projects in order to facilitate coordination among centers, institutes and programs.

Cto incorporate these activities into the planning of University Advancement and Office of Sponsored Programs and Research.

Susan Wallace

 

Carole Schor

Wayne Lewis

Barbara Sizemore

Michael Mezey

Budget managers of the institutes, centers and projects

Office of Sponsored Programs and Research (OSPR)

Controller

University Advancement

Human Resources

Staff Council

Analysis of grant activity against standards for indirect cost recovery.

Periodic evaluations by project directors of institutional support of grantsmanship activities.