Based on the article
"Making Sense of Taste"
by David V. Smith and
Robert F. Margolskee
Scientific American, March 2001
"How do cells on the tongue register the sensations of sweet, salty,
sour and bitter? Scientists are finding out—and discovering
how the brain
interprets these signals as various tastes "
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
It begins in the mouth and on the tongue(Though the early German Psychophysicists
|
|
Continues in the Nasal
|
|
Uses specialized receptors transduce
|
|
Where a flavor perception
|
Flavor is a
complex mixture of sensory input composed of taste (gustation),
smell (olfaction) and the tactile sensation of food as it is being chewed.
Although people may use the word “taste” to mean “flavor,” in the strict sense
it (taste) is applicable only to the sensations arising from specialized taste
cells in the mouth.
Scientists generally describe
human taste perception in terms of four qualities:
salty, sour,
sweet and bitter.
Another category that may also be present is
umami,
elicited by glutamate, an
amino acids that make up the proteins in meat, fish and legumes. Glutamate also
serves as a flavor enhancer in the form of the additive
monosodium glutamate (MSG).
![]() |
|
![]() |
After we begin chewing the salivary glands begin producing enzymes that predigest the food we are eating. |
The tongue is covered with specialized receptors that we refer to as taste buds |
the receptors on the tongue transduce the chemical sensation into an electrical signal (action potential) which travels along neural pathways to the brain. |
Scientists generally describe human taste perception in terms of four qualities: salty, sour, sweet and bitter. Another category that may also be present is umami, elicited by glutamate, an amino acids that make up the proteins in meat, fish and legumes.
|
|
![]() |
General layout of the tongue |
General sketch of a taste cell | The general layout of taste receptors on the tongue as derived from research in the early 19th century. |
TASTE DETECTORS
1)
Taste cells are components of taste buds, which are
located on the tongue and soft palate.
2) Taste
buds on the tongue are located within
papillae, the tiny projections that give the tongue its
velvety appearance.
3)
Fungiform ("mushroomlike") papillae
on the front part of the tongue and around edge of the tongue
4)
Circumvallate ("wall-like") papillae
are located at the back of the tongue are roughly 12 larger taste bud-containing
papillae called the
5) Taste
buds are structures that have between 50 and 100 taste
cells
6) Microvilli
is a fingerlike projections that poke through the
opening top of the taste bud called the
taste pore.
7) Chemicals from food termed
tastants dissolve in saliva and contact the taste cells through the taste pore.
8) the
food chemicals interact either with proteins on the surfaces of the taste
cells known as taste receptors
9)
or with
pore-like proteins called ion channels.
10)
These interactions
cause electrical changes
in the taste cells that trigger them
to send chemical signals that ultimately result in impulses to the brain.
11)
Taste cells, like neurons, normally
have a net negative charge internally and a net
positive charge externally.
12)
Such depolarization causes the taste cells to
release neurotransmitters, which prompt
neurons connected to the taste cells to relay
electrical
messages.
How Specialized are Taste Detectors?
1) There is not always a one-to-one correlation
between taste quality and chemical class,
particularly for bitter and sweet tastants.
2) Many carbohydrates are
sweet, for instance, but some are not.
3) Different types of
chemicals can evoke the same sensation: chloroform and the artificial
sweeteners aspartame and saccharin taste sweet even
though their chemical
structures have nothing in common with sugar.
4) The
compounds that elicit
salty or sour tastes are less diverse and are
typically ions that directly through ion
channels
5)
Those compounds responsible for sweet and bitter tastes bind to surface
receptors that trigger a sequence of signals to the cells' interiors that
ultimately results in the
opening and closing of ion channels.
6) In 1992 Margolskee
Susan K. McLaughlin and Peter J. McKinnon identified a key member of this
sequence. They named the molecule "gustducin"
because of its similarity
to transducin, a protein in retinal cells
that transduce light hitting the retina into an electrical impulse that
constitutes vision.
7) Gustducin and
transducin are both so-called G-proteins, which are found on the undersides
of many different types of receptors
these proteins are regulated by a
chemical called guanosine triphosphate, GTP.
9) When the right tastant
molecule binds to a taste cell receptor, (like a key in a lock) it
prompts the sub-units of gustducin to split apart and carry
out biochemical reactions
that open and close ion channels and make the cell interior more
positively charged. (remember it was negative!)
10)
The stimuli that the brain interprets as the basic tastes--salty, sour, sweet,
bitter and, possibly, umami--are registered via a series of chemical
reactions in the taste
cells of the taste buds.
11) The five
biochemical pathways underlying each taste quality are depicted here in separate
taste cells solely for clarity.
Is
each cell so specialized it only "recognizes" one tastant?
1)
Scientists have gone back and forth on whether individual neurons are
"tuned" to respond only to a single tastant such as salt or sugar--and
therefore signal only one
taste quality--or whether the activity in a given neuron contributes
to the neural representation of more than one taste.
2) Studies show that
both peripheral and central gustatory neurons typically respond to more than one
kind of stimulus. Although each neuron
responds most strongly
to one tastant, it usually also generates a
response to one or more other stimuli with
dissimilar taste qualities.
3)
How then can the brain represent various taste qualities if each neuron
responds to many different-tasting stimuli?
4) Many researchers believe
it can do so only by generating unique patterns of
activity across a large set of neurons.
Research
1) The
first electrophysiological studies of gustatory sensory neurons was done in the
early 1940s by Carl Pfaffmann of Brown University
2) He demonstrated that
peripheral neurons are not specifically responsive to stimuli
representing a single taste quality but instead
record a spectrum of
tastes.
3) Pfaffmann suggested that
taste quality might be represented by the pattern of
activity across
gustatory neurons because
the activity of any one
cell was ambiguous.
4) In the 1970s and
1980s several scientists began to accumulate data
indicating that individual neurons are turned maximally for one taste.
5) They interpreted this as
activity in a particular type of cell represented a
given taste quality-- they called this
labeled-line
hypothesis. (vs. across neurons pattern)
6)
According to this
activity in neurons that respond best to sugar would signal "sweetness,"
activity in those that respond best to acids
would signal "sourness".
7) Smith, Van
Buskirk, Travers and Bieber, (1983) demonstrated that the same cells that others
had interpreted as labeled lines
actually defined the
similarities and differences in the patterns
of activity across taste neurons.
8) This suggested that the
same neurons were responsible for taste-quality representation, whether they
were viewed
as
labeled lines or as critical parts of an
across-neuron pattern.
9)
These investigators further demonstrated that the
neural distinction among stimuli of different
qualities depended on the
simultaneous activation of different cell types, much as color vision
depends on the comparison of activity across photoreceptor cells in the eye.
10) These and other considerations have
led us to favor the idea that the
patterns of activity are key to
coding taste information.
11) Scientists now know that things that taste alike evoke
similar patterns of activity across groups of taste neurons.
12) What is more, they can use
multivariate statistical analysis to plot the similarities in the patterns
elicited by various tastants.
13) Taste researchers have generated such
comparisons for gustatory stimuli from the neural responses of hamsters and
rats.
14) These correspond very closely to
similar plots generated in behavioral experiments, from which scientists infer
which stimuli
taste alike and which
taste different to animals.
15) Such data show that the
across-neuron patterns contain sufficient information
for taste discrimination.
16) Because taste neurons are so widely responsive,
neurobiologists must compare the levels of activity of
a range of neurons to get an idea
of what sensation they
are registering.
17) No single
neuron type alone is capable of
discriminating among stimuli of different qualities,
because a given cell can
respond the same way to disparate stimuli, depending on their relative
concentrations.
18) In this sense, taste is like vision,
in which three types of photoreceptors respond to light of a broad range of
wavelengths
to allow us to see the
myriad hues of the rainbow.
19) It is well known that the absence of
one of these photoreceptor pigments disrupts color discrimination,
and this disruption
extends well beyond the wavelengths to which that receptor is most sensitive .
That is, discrimination
between red and green stimuli is disrupted when either the "red" or the "green"
photopigment is absent.
THE "TASTE MAP"
1) One of the most dubious and
misleading "facts" about taste--and one that is commonly reproduced
in textbooks
is the oft-cited
"tongue map" showing large regional differences in
sensitivity across the human tongue.
2) These maps indicate
that sweetness is detected by taste buds on the tip of the tongue, sourness on
the sides, bitterness
at the back and saltiness
along the edges.
3) Taste researchers have known for
many years that these tongue maps are wrong.
The maps arose early in the 20th century
as a result of a
misinterpretation of research reported in the late
1800s, and they have been almost impossible to purge from the
literature.
4) In reality, all
qualities of taste can be elicited from all the regions of the tongue that
contain taste buds.
So what does it all mean it terms of flavor experience?
1) Sensory information from taste
cells is critical for helping us to detect and respond appropriately to needed
nutrients.
2) The sweet taste of sugars,
for example, provides a strong impetus for the ingestion of carbohydrates.
3) Taste signals also evoke
physiological responses, such as the release of insulin, that aid in preparing
the body to use the nutrients effectively.
4) Humans and other animals
with a sodium deficiency will seek out and ingest sources of sodium.
5) Evidence also indicates
that people and animals with dietary deficiencies will eat foods high in certain
vitamins and minerals.
6) Just as important as
ingesting the appropriate nutrients is not ingesting harmful substances.
The universal avoidance
of intensely bitter molecules shows a strong link between taste and
disgust.
7) Toxic compounds,
such as strychnine and other common plant alkaloids, often have a strong
bitter taste.
In fact, many
plants have evolved such compounds as a protective mechanism against foraging
animals.
8) The sour taste of
spoiled foods also contributes to their avoidance
9) All animals, including
humans, generally reject acids and bitter-tasting substances at all but the
weakest concentrations.
10) The intense reactions of
pleasure and disgust evoked by sweet and bitter substances appear to be present
at birth and
to depend on neural
connections within the lower brain stem.
11) Animals with their forebrains
surgically disconnected and anencephalic human newborns (those lacking a
forebrain) show
facial responses
normally associated with pleasure and disgust when presented with sweet and
bitter stimuli, respectively.
12) The strong link between taste and
pleasure—or perhaps displeasure—is the basis of the phenomenon of taste-aversion
learning.
13) Animals, including humans, will
quickly learn to avoid a novel food if eating it causes, or is paired with,
gastrointestinal
distress.
14) Naturally occurring or experimentally
induced taste-aversion learning can follow a single pairing of tastant
and illness, even if there is a gap
of many hours between the two.
15) One side effect of radiation
treatments and chemotherapy in cancer patients is loss of appetite; much of this
is caused
by conditioned taste
aversions resulting from the gastrointestinal discomfort produced by these
treatments.
16) This mechanism has also made it
extremely difficult to devise an effective poison for the control of rats,
which are especially good
at making the association between novel tastants and their physiological
consequences.