next up previous
Next: About this document Up: Affective Reasoner personality models Previous: Closing

References

Elliott & Ortony1992
Elliott, C., and Ortony, A. 1992. Point of view: Reasoning about the concerns of others. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 809-814. Bloomington, IN: Cognitive Science Society.

Elliott & Siegle1993a
Elliott, C., and Siegle, G. 1993a. Emotion intensity factors in simulated `believable agents'. In Workshop on Architectures underlying motivation and emotion, 47-52. Birmingham, England: The University of Birmingham School of Computer Science and Centre for Research in Cognitive Science.

Elliott & Siegle1993b
Elliott, C., and Siegle, G. 1993b. Variables influencing the intensity of simulated affective states. In AAAI technical report for the Spring Symposium on Reasoning about Mental States: Formal Theories and Applications, 58-67. American Association for Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University, March 23-25, Palo Alto, CA.

Elliott, Rickel, & Lester1997
Elliott, C.; Rickel, J.; and Lester, J. 1997. Integrating affective computing into animated tutoring agents. In Proceedings of the IJCAI97 workshop, Animated Interface Agents: Making them Intelligent. To appear.

Elliott1992
Elliott, C. 1992. The Affective Reasoner: A Process Model of Emotions in a Multi-agent System. Ph.D. Dissertation, Northwestern University. The Institute for the Learning Sciences, Technical Report No. 32.

Elliott1993
Elliott, C. 1993. Using the affective reasoner to support social simulations. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 194-200. Chambery, France: Morgan Kaufmann.

Elliott1994
Elliott, C. 1994. Research problems in the use of a shallow artificial intelligence model of personality and emotion. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 9-15. Seattle, WA: AAAI.

Elliott1997
Elliott, C. 1997. I picked up catapia and other stories: A multimodal approach to expressivity for ``emotionally intelligent'' agents. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 451-457.

Lester & Stone1997
Lester, J. C., and Stone, B. A. 1997. Increasing believability in animated pedagogical agents. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 16-21.

Lester et al. 1997
Lester, J.; Converse, S.; Kahler, S.; Barlow, T.; Stone, B.; and Bhogal, R. 1997. The persona effect: Affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In Proceedings of CHI '97, 359-366.

Nass & Moon1994
Nass, C., and Moon, Y. 1994. Human-computer interaction as interpersonal interaction: Can computers have personalities? Stanford University. Working title, paper in preparation from interpreted data.

Nass & Sundar1994
Nass, C., and Sundar, S. S. 1994. Is human-computer interaction social or parasocial? Stanford University. Submitted to Human Communication Research.

Ortony, Clore, & Collins1988
Ortony, A.; Clore, G. L.; and Collins, A. 1988. The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press.

Rickel & Johnson1997
Rickel, J., and Johnson, L. 1997. Integrating pedagogical capabilities in a virtual environment agent. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 30-88.

Stone & Lester1996
Stone, B. A., and Lester, J. C. 1996. Dynamically sequencing an animated pedagogical agent. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 424-431.



Clark Elliott
Wed Dec 17 18:41:50 EST 1997