Readings: M&G | |
Celebrity Blog | |
Links to Celebrity Sites | |
Art as Transgression | |
Celebrity Places |
WHAT IS
CELEBRITY? |
|||
"A celebrity
is "known for being well-known" - Daniel Boorstin, The
Image
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Cultural definition: Celebrity
is composed of three elements: a Name
a Celebrity Text
(a.k.a. star text) - a Face those 3 to 10 factoids about
the
celebrity that "everyone" knows
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Structural definition:
Celebrity is a Transaction of
three crucial elements, -the Celebrity Construct This involves
the interaction between the "raw material of the person" and a set of Cultural Intermediaries (including,
but not limited
to: agents, publicists, trainers, make-up artists, etc.)
- Fans, the public, audience- Mediators |
|||
![]() ![]() |
|||
Star - Oxford Unabridged
Dictionary: This term for a lead actor
or
someone at the top of
their field dates to at least 1779. The earliest reference in the OED2
is from that date and is used by a man named Warner, recorded in
Jesse's George Selwyn and his Contemporaries published in 1844. The use
in theater predates the use in other fields.
|
|||
Celebrity Visuals |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Star System-
Movies: The Early Years:
Early on, actors
were not known by name, but in 1910, the star system came into being
via promotion of Vitagraph Co. actress Florence Lawrence, first known
as The Vitagraph Girl. Other companies, noting that this approach
improved business, responded by attaching names to popular faces and
fan magazines quickly followed, providing plentiful, and free,
publicity. Films had slowly been edging past the 20 minute mark, but
the drive to feature-length works began with the Italian spectacle
film, of which Quo Vadis (1913), running nine reels or about two hours,
was the most influential.
The first generation of star
actors included Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton, Mary Pickford, Douglas
Fairbanks, Marie Dressler, Lillian Gish, William S. Hart, Greta Garbo,
John Gilbert, Claudette Colbert, Rudolph Valentino, Janet Gaynor,
Ronald Colman, Clara Bow, Gloria Swanson, Lon Chaney, and Will Rogers.
During World War I the United States became dominant in the industry
and the moving picture expanded into the realm of education and
propaganda.
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
|||
C. Wright Mills, The Power
Elite,
1956 "The elite of
power, wealth, and celebrity do not have even a passing acquaintance
with the elite of culture, knowledge and sensibility; they are not in
touch with them-although the ostentatious fringes of the two worlds
sometimes overlap in the world of the celebrity."
The celebrities are The
Names
that need no further identification.
Those who know them so far exceed those of whom they know as to require
no exact computation. Wherever they go, they are recognized, and
moreover, recognized with some excitement and awe. Whatever they do has
publicity value. More or less continuously, over a period of time, they
are the material for the media of communication and entertainment. And,
when that time ends - as it must - and the celebrity still lives - as
he may - from time to time it may be asked "Remember him?" That is what
celebrity means."
|
|||
![]() |
|||
What's
killing
movie
stars? Where have all the Hollywood movie stars gone? By James
Warren, Chicago Tribune, June
30,
2008
To hear the July-August Radar tell it, the obituary page should now include news of "Movie Stars, Dead at 101." The self-described bible of "pop culture for smart people" argues that Hollywood, dependent on stars as "mythic beings" since the 1907 silent flick hit "Biograph Girl," now sees star after star failing at the box office of late, including Tom Cruise, Adam Sandler, Jim Carrey, Reese Witherspoon, Brad Pitt, George Clooney and Ben Stiller, among others. The star "who can reliably put butts in seats on opening weekend," this asserts, is now gone (Will Smith might be an exception). As "possible culprits," this cites: 1- overcoverage by a
supposedly vengeful tabloid press;
2- the rise of technology as driving force behind many flicks, especially for a generation fixed on video games; 3-a penchant by stars to creatively "stretch" and do so many varied parts that it's hard to keep a single persona as did predecessors ("portraying a freak-loving photographer one month and a Stepford wife another may be creatively satisfying for Nicole Kidman, but not for her audience"); 4-Internet-driven,
word-of-mouth buzz, especially bad buzz, that hurts movies, regardless
of who's in them; and the fact that
many famous actors become merely "celebrities" in this tabloid culture and, as astute industry watcher-author Neal Gabler puts it, tend to be in competition with movies, not serving them, as their personal lives are more engrossing to the outside world than their onscreen roles. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Links to Celebrity
Sites |
|||
![]() |
|||
Celebrity
Places![]() |
|||
Celebrity
Worship Celebrity Worship Syndrome - read all about it! "Celebrity Worship as Weak Religion" (2003) A Sociological Understanding of Celebrity Worship The para-social
object, God,
functions in gemeinschaften to regulate recognition and validation of
the individual self by other members of the community. If everyone
shares the same faith in the same God(s), each recognizes the other as
valid. In gesellschaften, the sense of self is not as propped up by
lateral corroboration as it is in gemeinschaften; in gesellschaften,
God has a new function, that of inflating the self through narcissistic
contemplation. In individualistic societies, God is a projection of
self-worship. This understanding accounts for the new polytheism and
the fact that people make God into anything that makes them feel good
about themselves. This, of course, holds for celebrity worship. The new
polytheism, then, is a direct result of the weakening of social
validation of the self through common para-social objects. When
para-social objects are no longer common, validation of the self tends
to be narcissistic and, as Simmel would have it, individuated
(solipsistic). -MAW
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
|||
Downside of
Celebrity
Culture "In early February,
North Korea's leader bragged about his nuclear
arsenal, the lagging U.S. dollar started climbing and the Prince of
Wales announced his engagement. But the serious-minded readers of
Bloomberg News were most interested in Charles and Camilla. Americans
have an insatiable appetite for celebrity news, and the juicier the
better - from Brad and Jennifer's breakup to Michael Jackson's trial to
Martha Stewart's jail term. Some observers say it's harmless to follow
the lives of celebrities. ... But media critics say celebrity coverage
is squeezing out legitimate news and that, as a result, the United
States is becoming a nation that knows more about the 'Battle of the
Network Stars' than the battle for Baghdad. With less attention being
paid to informing citizens about government and the world around them,
the critics warn, a cornerstone of a democratic society- an informed
populace - is being put in jeopardy."
-Howard
Altman,
"Celebrity Culture," CQ Researcher,
March 18, 05, v15,#11, pp.245-268
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Adcult
* Ubiquitous.
Advertising is
everywhere.
* Anonymous. It is extremely difficult to determine authorship in advertising. * Symbiotic. "Adcult shares the energy of other social organisms. The something with which it lives is on the surface entertainment and below the surface deep concerns of the specific culture." Advertisement merges with other cultural trends, like music. By viewing MTV videos, for example, one sees "how the colonizing power of commercial speech can quickly consume discrete forms and make them one." * Syncretic. "Adcult layers itself on top of other cultures." It builds on what has come before, like the Burger King commercial that has two diapered babies chatting as in Look Who's Talking. Twitchell likens this self-referential aspect of Adcult to religious ceremonies. * Profane. Advertising must excite and shock to get the consumers' attention. * Magical. Twitchell contends that he is "hardly the first to recognize that advertising is the gospel of redemption in the fallen world of capitalism, that advertising has become the vulgate of the secular belief in the redemption of commerce. In a most profound sense advertising and religion are part of the same meaning-making process: they occur at the margin of human concern about the world around us, and each attempts to breach the gap between us and objects by providing a systemic understanding. Whereas the Great Chain of Being organized the world of our ancestors, the marketplace of objects does it for us. They both promise redemption: one through faith, the other through purchase. But how are order and salvation affected? By magical thinking, pure and simple." [description of Twitchell's work taken from "Jesse Ventura and the Brave New World of Politainer Politics" by Ann Conley and David Schultz] |
|||
![]() |
|||
|
|||