Fall, 2001

DEPAUL UNIVERSITY STUDIES OXFORD
HOUSE
 

Recovering people are fortunate that a group of committed
academicians at DePaul University are studying recovery outcomes
for those in recovery from addiction.  The results of this research
will provide new food for thought to many within the medical/scientific
communities who have an interest in addiction and recovery.
Oxford Houses are especially fortunate that these dedicated
researchers have focused  in on our program and have recently
been granted funding by the National Institute of Alcohol and
Alcohol Abuse (NIAAA) and the National Institute of Drug Abuse
(NIDA) to research the role of Oxford Houses in the recovery
process.  We asked DePaul to send us information about their
research and they kindly provided us with the following:

In May 2001, DePaul University established the Center for Community
Research, led by community psychologist and professor,
Dr. Leonard Jason.  Among other projects, the Center will administer
two federal government grants to study Oxford Houses.

The NIAAA grant awarded to Dr. Jason and Associate Professor
of Psychology, Dr. Joseph Ferrari, began its second year of research
on July 1 of this year.  Later this year, the Center will begin research
under another grant through the National Institute of Drug
Abuse (NIDA).  Both grants explore the links between communal
living in Oxford Houses and abstinence.  Project Director Brad Olson
oversees the day-to-day activities of the NIAAA grant entitled
“An Evaluation of the Oxford House Model."  The grant is part of
the research that NIAAA is conducting on how communal living affects
sobriety while promoting long-term abstinence.  The study is being
conducted using Illinois Oxford House residents, and their outcomes
will be compared to participants who do not live in Oxford
Houses after treatment.

Oxford House Alumni Kathy Erickson and Bertel Williams will
assist in the study by recruiting participants and conducting interviews.
Leon Venable, Oxford House Coordinator for Northern Illinois, will
help place individuals from inpatient treatment centers into Oxford
Houses.  Participants in the study will complete an initial survey to be
followed by interviews every six months for a two-year period for
which they will receive monetary compensation.  The NIAAA study
will run until July 2006.

The NIDA Study entitled "Abstinent Social Support in Oxford House”
will extend beyond the Illinois area.  This study will be supervised
by Project Director Margaret Davis and will examine how Oxford
House impacts residents' social support, self-confidence, and
sobriety.  More information will be forthcoming in later issues of
Pathways concerning this study and how residents can become
participants.

The Center for Community Research staff would like to thank
the residents and administrative staff of Oxford House for helping
in this research.  We look forward to establishing and continuing
our relationships, and to the knowledge it will bring.





A Summary of DePaul University's Research with Oxford Houses

Introduction
    Over the past ten years, a DePaul University-based research team has been involved in studying Oxford Houses in order to better understand the role they play in substance abuse recovery.  Descriptions of our past and current research can be found in this packet.  This information was distributed at the 2002 Oxford House World Conference.

 

 
What are the characteristics of people living in Oxford Houses?

    The early studies we conducted helped introduce Oxford House to substance abuse professionals by describing some of the characteristics of the houses and residents.  An important goal of our first study was to examine whether Oxford House residents differed from people in other drug and alcohol recovery programs.  The information for this study was collected by Oxford House, Inc. between 1988 and 1993.  We found that:
    - 53% of the residents were never married
    - 58% of the residents were Caucasian
    - 70% of the residents were male
    - 71% of the residents had at least completed high school
    - 69% were employed with an adequate income to live independently
    - 53% used other drugs along with alcohol
    - 64% had experienced homelessness.  
These characteristics are similar to what has been found among individuals in other substance abuse treatment programs.  


Jason L.A., Ferrari J.R., , and Dvorchak P.A., Groessl E.J., Malloy, P.J. (1997).  The characteristics of
Alcoholics in self-help residential treatment settings:  A multi-site study of Oxford House.  Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 15, 53-63.  


What are the reasons for living in Oxford Houses?

When the first Illinois Oxford Houses opened in 1992, our research group began assessing the characteristics of male Oxford House residents as they entered one of eleven newly formed houses.  During the course of eighteen months, we conducted face-to-face interviews with 134 men who had lived in Oxford Houses.  Most men were employed (65.3%) and had an average monthly income of $805.88.  In addition, most indicated that they used more than one substance (74.2%), such as alcohol and at least one other drug.  

Residents reported that their primary reason for choosing to reside in an Oxford House was the fellowship provided and the existence of a structured setting where avoidance of substance use was enforced.  Moreover, they reported that the most important benefits of living in an Oxford House was the sense of community with similar others in a stable environment.  They also believed that Oxford House was unique in that it provided them with a self-paced recovery option and gave them sufficient time for personal psychological growth while avoiding the use of alcohol and other substances.  In addition, they believed Oxford House differed from other recovery programs they had experienced because it allowed fellowship with similar others, stability in their lives, and sufficient time for change and personal growth.  



Jason L.A., Ferrari J.R., Smith B., Marsh P., Dvorchak P.A., Groessl E.K., Pechota M.E.,
Curtin M., Bishop P.D., Knot E., & Bowden B.S. (1997).  An exploratory study of male recovering substance abusers living in a self-help, self-governed setting.  Journal of Mental Health Administration, 24, 332-339.


What do we know about self-help group attendance and spirituality among Oxford House members?

    We conducted interviews with the male Oxford House participants In Illinois in order to further explore self-help group attendance and issues of spirituality.
In these Oxford House residents.  We found:
- 76% reported current involvement with an Alcoholics Anonymous 12-step recovery program
    - 53% claimed fellowship with other AA members was important
    - 11% indicated their spirituality increased from the AA experience
    - 24% prayed regularly
    - 16% read the Bible regularly
    - 8% attended formal religious ceremonies
These findings indicate that during recovery, many people in Oxford Houses shift from being dependent on alcohol and drugs to finding peer support that may be helpful in maintaining sobriety.  Furthermore, this study suggests that AA spirituality is important for many people in recovery who live in self-help communal settings.  Therefore, the spirituality components of AA and the fellowship provided by such programs are important for helping many Oxford House recovering substance abusers remain sober.  


Nealon-Woods, M.A., Ferrari, J.R., & Jason, L.A.  (1995).  Twelve-step program use among Oxford House
residents:  Spirituality or social support in sobriety?  Journal of Substance Abuse, 7, 311-318.

What influences how long people stay in Oxford Houses?

In this study, we were interested in finding out what factors are related to the length of time people stay in an Oxford House.  From the information collected from the 134 men in the earlier studies, we found that older men were more likely to remain in an Oxford House for a longer period of time than younger men.  Older men had a length of stay approximately 196 days, while younger residents stayed approximately 156 days.  In addition, we discovered that those who were pessimistic about the future stayed in Oxford Houses for a shorter period of time.  Most importantly, we found that over a two year period, 69% of those interviewed either remained in the house or left on good terms, thus indicating that Oxford House residency was a positive experience for most residents.
    
In addition, we were interested in finding out how members of Oxford Houses felt about their community of peers in their home.  In this study, we created a scale to measure the psychological sense of community.  This scale measures whether a person feels they have a readily available support group of relationships upon which they can depend.  Our scale, which we call the Perceived Sense of Community Scale, was given to Oxford House residents.  We found that residents who stayed in Oxford Houses for longer periods of time experienced increases in their sense of community.  This finding indicates that Oxford Houses provide residents with a strong sense of fellowship with similar others in a supportive, abstinent setting, and the sense of fellowship becomes even stronger time.

Bishop, P.D., Jason, L.A., Ferrari, J.R., Huang, C.F.  (1998).  A survival analysis of communal-living self-
help, addiction recovery participants.  American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 803-821.  

Bishop, P.D., Chertok, F., Jason, L.A.  (1997).  Measuring sense of community: Beyond local boundaries.  
Journal of Primary Prevention, 18 (2), 193-212.

Are there gender differences within Oxford Houses?

    Our research team studied African-American women and men residing in Illinois and Missouri Oxford houses for an average of four months.  We found that women were more likely than men to:
    -report sexual abuse as an adult (24.6% of women, 10.7% of men)
    -be diagnosed with an eating disorder (10.7% of women, 1.5% of men)
    -engage in writing bad checks prior to recovery (32.3% of women, 16.9% of men)

We found that men, on the other hand, were more likely to:
    -have engaged in drug sales (44.6% of men, 23.1% of women)
-have engaged in residential theft prior to recovery (15.4% of men, 3.1% of women)

In another study, we compared men and women with and without children in Oxford Houses in the Illinois and Missouri.  We found that:
 - All groups reported they felt Oxford House would provide them a safe and sober setting in which to rebuild their lives.  
- Men had been hospitalized for their recovery more often than women with and without children.
    - Women without children were generally younger than other residents.

Ferrari, J.R., Curtin, M., Dvorchak P., Jason, L.A.  (1997).  Recovering from alcoholism in communal
living settings: Exploring the characteristics of African-American men and women.  Journal of Substance Abuse, 9, 77-87.

Ferrari, J.R., Jason, L.A., Nelson, R., Curtin-Davis, M., Marsh, P., & Smith, B.  (1999).  An exploratory
analysis of women and men within a self-help, communal-living recovery setting:  A new beginning in a new house.  American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 25, 305-317.  
 

What percent of Oxford House residents have psychological problems?

    We interviewed 52 recovering substance abusers who lived in Oxford Houses in Missouri to find out if these Oxford House residents face issues other than substance addictions.  Twenty-one percent of the residents did not report any psychiatric disorder other than substance abuse.  However, we found that that many Oxford House residents deal with other psychological problems as well as substance abuse.  Specifically, antisocial, mood, and anxiety disorders were most common in people whose drugs of choice were cocaine, alcohol, and cannabis.  Antisocial Personality Disorder was diagnosed in 57.7% of residents; Mood Disorders were diagnosed in 38.5% of residents; Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in 34.5% of residents; and Major Depression in 26.9% of residents.  Women were diagnosed more frequently than men with panic disorder (26.1% of women, 6.9% of men).  Forty-two percent of residents reported two or more psychiatric disorders.

Another important finding was at a 6 month follow-up, we found that 42% of participants were still residing in an Oxford House while 27% had left on good terms, demonstrating at 69% overall success rate among participants in the study.  This suggests that most individuals entering Oxford Houses have a successful experience.


Majer, J., Jason, L.A, Ferrari J.R., & North, C. (2002).  Comorbidity among Oxford House residents: A
preliminary outcome study.  Addictive Behaviors, 27, 837-845.

Are traumatic events related to substance abuse and psychological symptoms?

Fifty-eight women in Oxford Houses across the country were interviewed, and 93% stated that they used alcohol, while 86% stated that they used more than one substance.  A majority of the women had experienced depression (67%), anxiety (65%), and suicidal thoughts (53%).  Many women had attempted suicide (46%) and had eating disorders (26 %).  Overall, 95% of the women reported some type of emotional, physical, or sexual abuse during their lives.  In addition, we found that the incidence of adult physical abuse was significantly related to many psychiatric symptoms, including depression, anxiety, hallucinations, suicidal thoughts, suicide attempts, and the use of psychiatric medication.  These findings are similar to what has been found among residents of domestic abuse shelters.  

Finally, the women in the study indicated that they had a higher sense of community than every other group that data as been collected on with our scale.  This indicates that Oxford House is a supportive environment for women who have experienced trauma and psychological problems.  We conclude from this data that Oxford Houses are good settings for women who have been in abusive relationships.

Curtis, C.E., Olson, B.D., Jason, L.A., Ferrari, J.R., & Olabode-Dada, O. (2002).  Examining substance abuse, disordered eating, and trauma in Oxford House.  A poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.

 Olson, B. D., Curtis, C. E., Jason, L. A., Ferrari J. R., Horin, E. V., Davis, M. I., Flynn, A. M., & Alvarez,
J. (in press). Physical and Sexual Trauma, Psychiatric Symptoms, and Sense of Community among Women in Recovery: Toward a New Model of Shelter Aftercare. Journal of Intervention and Prevention in the Community.

Horin, E.V., Curtis, C.E., Flynn, A.M., Davis, M.I., Olson, B.D., Alvarez, J., Ferrari, J.R., & Jason, L.A.  
(2002).  An assessment of the relationship between trauma, substance abuse, and psychiatric comorbidity among females in a communal-living setting.  A poster presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, Il.

How does Oxford House relate to the criminal justice system?

Laws, such as California's Proposition 36, that direct non-violent substance-abusing offenders toward community-based treatment programs, have become the justice system’s preferred response over prison confinement. Therefore, there is a continuing need for more cost-effective, community-based substance abuse programs. Oxford Houses could be one alternative option to incarceration.  We were interested in examining whether the legal, employment, drug use, and criminal justice histories of Oxford House residents were similar to a national sample in inpatient facilities.

Forty-six Oxford House residents were compared to a sample of 46 clients from traditional inpatient programs.  Few significant differences were found between Oxford House residents and the traditional inpatient sample. Many individuals are in inpatient facilities or are incarcerated because of drug offenses.  Because individuals within Oxford Houses seem to be similar to those within inpatient programs, we believe that Oxford House could be a justifiable alternative to inpatient treatment and incarceration.


Oleniczak, J.T., Olabode-Dada, O., Viola. J.J, Davis, M.I., Olson B.D., Ferrari, J.R., & Jason, L.A.  (2002).
A Comparison of Past Criminal Activity in a Community-Based vs. a Traditional Approach to Substance Abuse Recovery.  A poster presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.

What do we know about optimism and beliefs about remaining abstinent among Oxford House residents?

In a recent dissertation by John Majer, he examined 42 Oxford House members versus 42 members of AA self-help groups.  For those individuals with less than 180 days abstinent, Oxford House residents had higher levels of optimism and were more likely to believe that they could remain abstinent than those in the self help groups.
Eighty-three percent of Oxford House members reported a history of serving time in jail whereas the rate was only 55% for the twelve-step members. Twelve-step members who had one or more convictions reported lower optimism and were less confident that they could remain abstinent than those without one or more convictions; however, for the Oxford House members, those with and without convictions had similar levels of optimism and beliefs they could remain abstinent.  

These findings suggest that the Oxford House model, in comparison to those who solely attend twelve-step programs, might be more effective in empowering residents in their ongoing abstinence in a way that enhances the perception of control in their lives.

Do Women and Men use Support Differently in Oxford Houses?

In a recent dissertation, Margaret Davis explored similarities and differences between women and men, particularly looking at their social support networks and their beliefs that they could remain abstinent from alcohol and drugs. Participants were 120 residents of Oxford Houses from several states. Findings revealed that both men and women were similar in terms of the size and strength of their social support networks and their strong beliefs about remaining abstinent. Also for both women and men, living in OH was significantly related to increased social networks that emphasize abstinence.  Interestingly, for women, their social support networks were directly related to their confidence with being able to stay abstinent. Whereas with men, social support seemed to play a smaller role in determining their beliefs that they can remain abstinent. It appears that social support plays a different role in women's recovery than it does in men's. These results draw attention to the different benefits women can reap from positive support networks and that Oxford House may provide an environment that specifically meets a number of special needs for women in recovery.

Are there many Latinos involved in Oxford Houses?

For the past few months, Josefina Alvarez has been interviewing Oxford House members in several states to learn more about the reasons why there are few Hispanics/Latinos in Oxford Houses.  So far, she has interviewed 11 Hispanic/Latino Oxford House members, three women and eight men.

The Hispanic/Latino Oxford House members she has interviewed have mentioned that living in an Oxford House has been a key part of their recovery.  They have provided us several reasons why there are only a few Latinos in Oxford House.  The reasons they have given us include not knowing that Oxford Houses exist, inability to speak English, and not having the money to pay for rent after leaving treatment.  

If you identify yourself as a Hispanic or Latino, please call Dr. Alvarez toll free at 1-877-TOSTUDY (1-877-867-8839) if you would like to participate in this study which involves a confidential conversation for about an hour.  Unlike some of our other studies, participants do not need to live in an Oxford House at the time of the interview.  
 

What other Oxford House research projects are going on at DePaul University?

There are several research projects ongoing at our center.  In one NIAAA grant supported study, we are recruiting 150 people who are finishing substance abuse treatment at an alcohol and drug abuse facility in Illinois.  Half are assigned to live in an Oxford House, while the other half receives regular after-care services after leaving this facility.  Each of these individuals will be interviewed every six months for a two-year period of time.  This study will look at the effects of Oxford House on recovering alcoholics' sobriety and their belief that they have the ability to maintain abstinence.  

Another study, which is funded by a grant from NIDA, involves researching Oxford House residents across the country.  We have approximately 900 participants who will be interviewed four times.  In this large national study, we will be examining how members of Oxford Houses change during the course of a year.  We will examine how their friendship networks change, how their sense of confidence in staying abstinent changes, and what occurs when they leave Oxford Houses.  These studies will give us a unique perspective for better understanding the many benefits of living in Oxford Houses.  

In addition to the two large studies being conducted currently, there are several other studies ongoing.  These include:
- investigating the relationships between social support, the belief that one has the ability to maintain abstinence, and ethnic identity among African American Oxford House residents;
- exploring how different types of social relationships affect substance use and recovery;
- evaluating the physical settings (neighborhood, characteristics, etc.) of East Coast , Midwest, and West coast houses to find how they are similar and dissimilar;  
- examining the role of Oxford Houses in different populations, specifically women who have experienced trauma and/or homelessness;
-looking at how having children in the home affect women's recovery and women's interactions with one another.  Our preliminary results show that all house members enjoy having the children in the home, and Oxford House residents report that the children help with their recovery and interactions, even if it is stressful at times to have children around;
- studying the way Oxford Houses effect children who live in them;
- investigating how individuals in Oxford Houses cope with their problems;
- examining how residents self-regulate their abilities toward abstinence;
- studying the growth and development of the national links of Oxford House across the United States;
- measuring the effect of sense of community and neighborhood characteristics among residents.  
- learning how Oxford House members help each other over time and how this is beneficial toward recovery.
If there are areas that you feel we should be investigating, please let us know.  


Copyright 1994 The Seattle Times Company
The Seattle Times

April 17, 1994, Sunday, Final Edition

SECTION: SCENE; Pg. M1


HEADLINE: OXFORD HOUSE

BYLINE: BY CAREY QUAN GELERNTER


Who wants to read about substance abuse?

Won't it be the same old story - taxpayer money spent on social services to turn drug addicts and alcoholics around - only the problem seems to get worse?

But wait, says clinical and community psychologist Leonard Jason. After two years of checking it out, the DePaul University researcher says he's found something that really works, "an amazing grassroots phenomenon," he says, that's been accomplished almost entirely with volunteers at almost no cost to taxpayers.

It's called Oxford House, and it has grown from one self-run, self-supporting recovery house in the Washington, D.C., area in 1975, to more than 500 in 35 states in 1994. In Washington state, the first house opened in August 1990; today, there are 28.

Oxford House's concept is deceptively simple. Self-run means no professionals, such as counselors or house managers, and a pure democracy. Every resident has one vote, all participate in running the house, with officers rotating every six months. That eliminates "us against them" sentiments and the addict's traditional resentment of authority, fosters responsibility and, as residents' leadership and self-management skills grow, self-confidence.

Every resident must pay his own way; established houses help new houses get started. Unlike traditional half-way houses, with often-short time limits, residents can stay as long as they like, as long as they pay their rent and follow the number one rule: sobriety.

Relapse means automatic expulsion. (They can reapply, but only after 30 days of sobriety.)
"An incredible system of health care delivery," Jason calls it.

"A mission and a movement" is the description by founder J. Paul Molloy - a former drunk, former wife-beater, and former Republican counsel to the Senate Commerce Committee. (It was by dint of his Capitol Hill political connections that, in 1988, a bill was passed corralling states into setting up $ 100,000 revolving loan funds to start up new houses along the Oxford House model. After that, expansion took off.)
The big puzzle, says Jason, is why he is the only one researching the "why and how" of oxford House's apparent success - given a field where traditional treatment is expensive yet recidivism is high.

Not only that, he says, it's a potential model for solving other social problems, from homelessness to gangs. "No one thinks in these types of innovative ways because sometimes our preciousness as 'professionals' has been threatened. We need to look at grassroots efforts of people to solve their own problems," Jason says.

"We professionals are very good at changing behavior, but not very good at what community psychologists say we should be doing: create 'ecological systems' within the community that are supportive, protective, instill values."

Oxford House, he concludes, is just such an ecological system.

Business meetings

4 p.m. on a Sunday. All seven members of Oxford House, Oak Tree, are present for the weekly "business meeting," seated around their dining-table at the spotlessly clean, comfortable four-bedroom North End home.

Their ages range from 24 to 42. They are a maintenance supervisor, a mechanic, a warehouseman, a concrete carpenter, a dry wall helper, a dump truck driver, and an industrial salesman. Four are white, two are black, one is Latino.

All are former alcoholics and/or drug users whose number one goal is to stay clean and sober. Living at Oxford House is key to their plan.

As usual, much of the meeting is routine, conducted in dry parliamentary fashion. The men vote to buy two new fry pans, two laundry baskets, light bulbs and a can opener. The treasurer reports on their bank account ($ 1,087), bills, and fines levied ($ 50 to one resident for being late in rent, $ 20 for missing a business meeting; $ 5 for not doing an assigned chore).

But today emotions run higher than usual. Two members have just been kicked out. Dave was way late in his rent; he has shown up to explain. Mark was booted for relapsing to heroin use.

Dave, 29, a computer programmer analyst, seated in a corner, pleads his case. He disappeared without letting them know where he was, or when they could expect rent, because he was in the Snohomish County jail. Stopped for jaywalking, the police officer discovered his outstanding warrants for car theft and forgery - things he did before he went into treatment last June.

Every time he called Oxford House collect from jail, he got the answering machine. He finally got through, he said - to Mark, and he didn't know Mark had relapsed.

The guys consider the situation. They give Dave points for still staying clean and sober, still attending NA. "I don't want to see anybody on the street who is serious about not relapsing," says Guy Walker, 31, the mechanic, who has been here since June, when he left treatment.
Because Mark was paid up through the month, they have a little cushion. But Dave must come up with the $ 250 month's rent.

Walker tells him about a temporary-work agency around the corner, says he can make $ 35-$ 40 a day, mostly construction jobs. Walker knows, because in his own bad old days held do a temp job, then blow the money that night on booze. Dave promises he'll jump on the idea.

Oid Mattox, 38, the dump truck driver and mechanic, suggests another condition: Dave must get his legal problems settled, and report to everyone at the next meeting. Dave promises to do that. "My normal state is to run, go to another state. But I can't afford to do that. I'm making major changes, to clean up this wreckage I've made of my life.”

"Welcome back," a couple of the guys say, and everyone murmurs assent.

"Stay clean," adds president Mike winsberry, the maintenance supervisor, at 42 their "elder statesman."

There is discussion of the condition of the house (the garage is a mess; three of the guys just rebuilt Winsberry's engine inside); getting new dead-bolts because Mark has the house key. Mattox talks about the presentations he has made at treatment centers, to recruit new members to Oxford Houses. He is supposed to be leaving to start a new Oxford House in Tacoma - experienced members are tapped to "seed" and lead new houses - but now that's in doubt; the, Tacoma landlord is asking too much money.

Plans are made for an upcoming workshop in Vancouver, where they can learn better ways to run the houses and fulfill the different officer roles, and for a potluck at the Mercer Island house with founder Molloy, who will be in town.

They close with "reflections. 11 Each man shares how his week has gone:

A tiff with a boss, news that a younger brother is into drugs . . . excitement over joining a gym . . . anticipation of the Vancouver workshop. Several say they have been so busy with Oxford House-related work, they haven't had time to think about "using."

Dave talks about his great sense of relief of being accepted "home" again.

Out on the streets, "I was noticing homeless people more than I ever have. The misery. The drug abuse. I'm a guy with a college education, upper middle class family, it scared me. I'm grateful to you guys."

There is disappointment all around about Mark's relapse. Winsberry sums it up. "At least we salvaged one," he says, referring to Dave. "We can't save the world. You have to save yourself. It's bad out there."

He feels bad about Mark, he says, but Oak Tree is a strong house and will stay strong.

(In the almost-year long history of the house, Mark makes the third failure. one guy was kicked out after being picked up for a DWI, another for trying to start a fight - ironically, with Mark).
But the highlight is Walker's week. His dad was in town, for the first time in a year. When held last seen his dad, Walker had been homeless, and bummed $ 10 off him; he heard that his dad commented to others that "I was sucking off welfare and I'd never amount to anything."

But this time, he took his Dad out to dinner, drove him in his newly financed car, took him to the garage where he's now assistant manager and showed him his new tool box (held pawned his tools in his drunk days) and showed him oxford House - a place nicer than his family had ever lived in. His dad saw him give his little brother a dirt bike held just bought, and watched the boy's eyes light up. "Giving truly is the funniest thing on earth," Walker says.

Postscript: In the weeks following that business meeting, the industrial salesman is kicked out after it's discovered that he cashed some of the Oxford House checks at a tavern. And Winsberry decides that, after almost a year of residency, he's going to get a place of his own. He says he's learned as much as he can, and he's feeling ready to move on.

How it started

The guys are looking forward to meeting Molloy almost the way adherents of a religion look to a spiritual leader.

Molloy, 55, says he has steadfastly resisted any guru-type trappings: "I fight this personal cult thing. The worst thing was Synanon (the California-based drug-rehabilitation center that became embroiled in allegations of violence and harassment in the 1970s). Oxford House has gone out of its way to make sure that doesn't happen."

He says he doesn't collect his salary - his wife supports him. In town for a visit, he stays at the Bellevue Oxford House. Insurance against power hunger also prompts the democratic structure.

Still, it is clear that there would be no Oxford House without the vision and political savvy of Molloy. And, although he intended to step down as CEO in 1992, he quickly changed his mind, saying there was too much infighting and no one ready to take over.

It was hardly a career he envisioned back in 1975, when he and several others complained at their AA meeting that the county was closing the Maryland halfway house where they were living.

Molloy had just gone through treatment, his world having finally collapsed as his alcoholism worsened; he had been drinking two fifths of Canadian Club a day. His wife committed him briefly to a mental institution, and filed for divorce. His high-powered career as a congressional staff lawyer crashed.

One AA member told the complaining men to stop pitying themselves and rent their own house. Another AA member loaned them $ 750 to do it; six took up the plan.

They flourished. Their new house soon had a surplus of $ 1,200, and members voted to rent another house - to take care of all the applicants asking to move in.
After 2 1/2 years, Molloy moved out, but remained involved as a volunteer.

The network of Oxford Houses continued to grow, but really took off when Congress established the revolving loan fund. In his Republican soul, Molloy didn't like the government involvement, but says he realized there was no way to achieve major expansion without it. He still prefers to get funding from foundations.

He takes comfort that the only cost to taxpayers is the occasional house that fails without paying back its loan, and even then, fellow houses in the chapter .have been known to take it upon themselves to repay the money.

Plus, there are the salaries of organizers that some counties or states hire to set up a new house.

All houses are located in "good neighborhoods," according to Molloy. The idea is to bolster self-esteem and a sense of starting over, reduce temptation of easy access to drugs, and ensure that residents don't take up old habits and acquaintances in former haunts.

Each house is independent, with residents admitted by vote of the others. Clusters of houses are organized into chapters, which provide quality control and mutual support. Money collected from chapter dues can bail out houses in temporary trouble.

Since 1975, 6,000 men and women have lived in Oxford Houses, on average staying 15 months, although some stay for years. Today, there are 4,536 men and women living in an Oxford House.

Staying clean - the numbers

The tricky part is the statistics on recidivism. Professor Jason wants to do long-term tracking.

The organization cites about an 80 percent success rate, meaning that 20 percent relapse while in an Oxford House (21 percent in Washington state). But there is no tracking after they leave. The most comprehensive study done to date has found a 90 percent relapse rate within 18 months following treatment programs in general, although 2-3 percent get clean and sober every year after that, says Molloy. The main problem is that there is no support for the treated substance abuser after treatment, and they usually go back into the environment where their addiction took hold - a recipe for falling back into old habits and friends.

Not in my neighborhood

While it doesn't cost taxpayers a lot of money, Oxford House sometimes does exact a more difficult price: community acceptance.

While many neighbors have grown to accept the Oxford House presence in their midst, others have not. It's not that the houses stand out as being residences of "undesirables." Actually, residents go out of their way to be good neighbors, knowing the scrutiny they're under: rent is paid on time, houses are kept up, even rehabbed in some cases. But neighbors often fear that their own property values will slip.
Oxford House has fought lawsuits all over the country, including a city of Edmonds case that recently was decided by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, over where they can locate. At issue is the interpretation of the federal law governing the rights of the disabled to live where they choose.

Edmonds contends its zoning law - which prohibits more than five unrelated persons from living together in a single-family neighborhood - is exempt from the fair housing law. The American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of Oxford House, along with the U.S. Justice Department, took the opposite view, and the Ninth Circuit agreed. It then sent back the question of whether Edmonds' zoning law violates rights of the disabled to the lower court.

That is one of two circuit decisions now standing in the country - the other is in Georgia, and reaches the opposite conclusion. Some believe the matter will have to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

For now, though, the 9th Circuit prevails here, and the decision already has prompted other communities in the state, including Bellevue, to rethink restrictions on Oxford Houses.

Washington - a strong state

The Washington victory was fitting so far as Oxford House is concerned, given that this state has been a strong supporter. Three of the nine board members are Washingtonians, and many of the state's houses and volunteers are considered particularly effective.

Molloy attributes this to at least some state support for services for recovering addicts and alcoholics ("here maybe they're not on the front burner, but they're an item on the stove"). In some states, he says, the support is lacking because of the perception that substance abuse is "a black problem."

Here, state officials have lauded Oxford House. Some of the state managers say there are some who Oxford House isn't right for: those too young and immature, or a mentally ill addict who needs more intervention, may not be ready.

But, says Steve Freng, systems chief for the Division of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services in King County: "Oxford House. . . is the most thoughtful, decentralized yet structured approach that I have seen in my career."

It hasn't all been a wild success story here, however.

Since 1990, three houses have failed: two in Everett and one in Bothell. State outreach coordinator Myrna Brown, the grandmotherly "den mother of Oxford House," says several problems were at work: the Bothell house was too far from transportation; in one of the Everett houses, the landlord kept upping the rent (they’ve, since learned to insist on leases); and she suspects Everett may have been too far from the rest of the houses in the chapter for proper support.

These days Brown - a recovering alcoholic, former executive director of the Republican Party in Multnomah County, former program director for the Oregon state Republican Party - has trained her focus on Thurston and Mason counties and may extend that to Grays Harbor. Her goal: to fill in the I-5 corridor. Eventually, the organization sees the need for 100 houses in the state. Freng says King County probably could use 20-30 (there are 10 now, and a total of 14 in King, Snohomish and Island counties).

The future:

Oxford House still is operating on a shoestring, though no longer all-volunteer. Nowadays there are 26 paid employees, 10 of those outreach workers who help open new houses.

Molloy says his goal is 10,000 houses open in the country by the year 2,000.

That would seem to require a miracle, but with the enthusiasm of its believer residents, who knows?

Hear Oid Mattox, a decorated Vietnam veteran brought to the brink of suicide by his cocaine habit before he joined Oxford House:

"Because of Oxford House I've seen people who have gotten good jobs, gotten back relationships with a child, given their parents hope. I've seen people jump up and hug you after you tell them their application has been accepted to an Oxford House. I've seen a lot of success stories. A lot of miracles."


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A SURVEY OF WASHINGTON STATE MEN AND WOMEN IN OXFORD HOUSES SHOWS:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- The majority have been in treatment before: 18 percent enter having just completed their first treatment, 19 percent have been in treatment more than 10 times. The average resident has been through detoxication without further treatment an average of 2.5 times, and in addition have been through treatment an average of twice.
-- Some 62 percent have been homeless during their addiction, an average of three-plus times; 13 percent were homeless at the time they entered Oxford House.
-- 75 percent have served jail time, the average length a little over nine months, the average number of prior arrests almost 6. No different in relapse rate was found between those who served jail time and those who didn't.
-- Educational level ranges from less than 8th grade to graduate college degrees, but the median is a little above high-school graduation.
-- They are 85 percent white, 9 percent black, I percent Hispanic, and 5 percent other.
-- Their median age is 36.
-- They attend an average of almost four meetings of AA or NA weekly.
-- They are divided roughly half and half between former drug addicts (49 percent) and recovering alcoholics (51 percent).

 

LOAD-DATE-MDC: Apr 1 18, 1994



DAILY  SOUTHTOWN
A Pulitzer Community Newspaper
January 2, 1995

Struggling down road to recovery
DePaul helps moms stay straight

By Meg McSherry
Staff Writer

Brett Jones has a new home now, on a quiet street and it’s filled with love and promise.
But the 10-year-old still nearly bursts with emotion at the mean thought of the old days, when he lived in a    t dark apartment on the West Side, wore dirty and wrinkled shirts to school, and watched his mother fall deeper and deeper into the grip of drugs.
"Is it better now?" he is asked.
Brett fidgets, fumbles for words and stares at the ceiling with his big brown eyes. Then he just lets go. Tears stream from his face.
"I'm just remembering," he says.
Brett's mother, now clean for several weeks but still struggling to hang on, is apologetic.
"I didn't realize through my addiction how much I took away from him," rays Geraldine Sullivan, wiping tears from her cheeks.
Recovering from drug and alcohol abuse is a painful, emotional process. But Sullivan and her son have more hope now because of their recent move to an Oxford House for recovering addicts and their children in Marquette Park.
The Mozart Oxford House, 7314 S. Mozart St., Chicago, was opened by DePaul University professor who believes it can be the key to a better life for mother looking to start anew.
Rather than strict disciplinary approach of many long-term drug recovery programs, Oxford Houses rely on residents to set up their house rules and a support network for keeping each other drug-free.
Residents usually move in after they’ve completed drug treatment programs and are searching for permanent homes.
More than 500 Oxford House group homes have opened across the country since 1975, when the first one opened in Maryland for recovering alcoholic men.  There are 14 homes in Illinois, 12 for men and two for women. The Mozart Oxford House is the state's first to accept children.
“This is a really important house," said Leonard Jason a psychology professor at DePaul who helped win grant money to open the Mozart home. "We think there's a need for hundreds of these houses"
Residents of the Mozart house - five women and three children under age 10 - believe it May be their best chance yet for permanent recovery. But they're not naive about it. Many have been in and out of treatment programs for years. Several became addicts in their teens and have been struggling to break five from drug dependency for decades. They realize it may be a long, hard road before they’ll feel confident that life without drugs is doable.
Cheryl Dutton, 39, was homeless and near death before she agreed to enter a drug treatment program several months ago in Chicago. She has cirrhosis, a chronic liver disease brought on by alcohol abuse, and pancreatitis., When she was initially admitted to the hospital doctors didn't believe she would pull through, she says.
She's been sober for about two months, and is living day by day. The Oxford House is the perfect place for her, Dutton says, because of the constant support and concern from other women and the stability and peace that the home provides. Without it, she may have ended up on the streets because family members had grown frustrated with her.
“This place allows you the time to work on inner issues. Now I can do some real digging and soul- searching. You've got to learn to love yourself to get better," she said. "And the women in this house tell me I don't need to punish myself anymore."
Still Dutton faces some huge challenges. Her education stopped at fourth grade. She's been on her own and addicted to alcohol since she was 13. She's still struggling with severe emotional problems.
"It is work ... but I have people I love here," she said.
Brett's mom has a better education than Dutton and a clothing design business, but faces her own struggles.  She was evicted from her West Side apartment before she decided to give a treatment program a try.
Now that she's sober, Sullivan must face the guilt she feels, particularly over the way she treated her son when she was using drugs. Her neglect us hurt her son deeply, she said.
This Christmas, Brett was with relatives out-of-state. Family members bought the plane ticket months ago when they weren't any if his mother would be sober enough to care for him. Days before the trip, Brett couldn't stop crying because he didn't want to go.  Neither could his mother, after seeing the pain in her son’s eyes.
"We have real issues we have to deal with. This is real stuff," she said.
Another recovering addict, Barbara Everett, 48, watched the mother and son scene with recognition.  She had been through the same emotions with her own sons.
"I am standing here but my heart is on my knees," she said.
As DePaul's Jason sees it, the Mozart house's success depends on the women themselves -  as it should.
“We've got to start providing people with resources so they can help themselves,” he said. 
Oxford House is a promising alternative to traditional group homes for addicts, which are run under strict rules and with the supervision of a professional director, said Sandra Herron, a recruiter hired by DePaul to get the Mozart House off the ground.
Oxford Houses were founded on the belief that recovering addicts need to rebuild their lives by taking on an increasing level of responsibility in a supportive environment.  Residents set their own rules, interview potential new members as a "family” and make democratic decisions about the operation of the house.
DePaul matched a $16,000 grant from the Chicago Community Trust to pay for Herron. The Illinois Department of Alcohol and Substance Abuse provided a $4,000 stipend for the first month’s rent and security deposit.
Herron interviewed applicants and will live with residents for three months to help get them on their feet. After that, she’ll move out and try to open another Oxford House. While Herron will check on the women periodically, they’ll be responsible for their own lives after February.
Oxford House members elect officers, pay their own share of the rent, and are expected to go back to school or hold jobs. Different homes can set up their own rules, but all live under the most important regulation - that residents stay drug and alcohol-free.
If other residents suspect someone has relapsed, that person is evicted.
While universities are not normally in the business of launching social service programs, Jason says DePaul leaders felt Oxford House was too promising of a concept to be left untouched.
In many cases, women coming out of residential drug treatment programs have trouble finding a suitable place to live, Jason says.  Few can afford to live on their own, especially if they've lost their jobs or been evicted from their apartments, and many group homes offer only short-term residency.
"We (society) haven't been very good at developing long-term places allowing people to form a community, get connected and get hope and the ability to stay sober," Jason said.
He says he's amazed that government leaders don't open more Oxford Houses.
"The lack of vision among key people everywhere has been absolutely astounding to me," Jason said. "I can't understand why people don't see that there really is such a need for this and that it solves so many problems ... It's such a powerful model"
For Everett, 48, Oxford House has taught her a lesson she didn't learn in other recovery programs.
"When I first went into recovery, I thought it was about not using. I was wrong. It's about change," she said. "And I'm grateful to be here."