An Evaluation of the Oxford House Model
Abstinent
Social Support in Oxford House
Grant Proposal funded by the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Principal Investigator: Leonard A. Jason, DePaul University
Co-Principal Investigator: Joseph R. Ferrari, DePaul University
Project Director: Brad Olson, DePaul University
OH Recruiters: Kathy Erickson and Bertel Williams
Consultants: Ed Anderson, University of Texas
William Filstead, Northwestern University
Richard Longabaugh, Brown University
Carol North, Washington University
Abstract
Oxford House, a national program that provides a supportive, democratic,
self-help setting with other recovering alcoholics, well illustrates a
community-based approach toward alcohol sobriety. Oxford Houses might represent
cost-effective and efficient settings where individuals who are recovering
from addictions can experience a sense of community and develop self-efficacy
toward abstinence. Each local Oxford House aims to provide a setting for
developing skills that enable long-term sobriety. There are over 600 Oxford
Houses across the country serving thousands of men and women. The present
proposal is in response to program announcement PAS-98-037. In
the proposed study, we will recruit 150 participants, all of whom are in
the process of finishing treatment at an alcohol and drug abuse facility
in Illinois. Seventy-five will be randomly assigned to Oxford Houses and
75 to regular care. These individuals will be interviewed every 6 months
for a two year period of time. The present outcome study will assess
the effects of communal living in an abstinence supportive setting on recovering
alcoholics' sobriety, self-efficacy beliefs, abstinence social support
networks, employment outcomes, and illegal activity. This
study would be the first longitudinal evaluation of Oxford Houses, and
it would provide important information on the nature and role of the Oxford
House experience on long-term sobriety among recovering alcoholics.
Grant funded by NIDA
Principal Investigator: Leonard A. Jason, DePaul University
Co-Principal Investigator: Joseph R. Ferrari, DePaul University
Project Director: Meg Davis, DePaul University
Abstract
Oxford House (OH), founded in 1975, illustrates
a community-based approach toward substance abuse abstinence. Unlike
traditional hospital care and therapeutic communities, which involve the
use of professionals and have limitations on length of stay, Oxford House
offers a community where residents can live without the involvement of
professional treatment staff and where there are no time restrictions on
residency (Oxford House Manual, 1988). Because there is no maximum stay
nor involvement of professionals, OH may offer a cost effective alternative
to more traditional approaches to substance abuse recovery whereby residents
may have a greater opportunity to develop necessary skills and increase
their self-efficacy toward maintaining abstinence. An Oxford House
communal living experience offers residents abstinence social support networks.
To the extent that recovering substance abusers invest or commit themselves
to these networks (Longabaugh et al., 1993), it would be expected that
support for abstinence from similar others living with an Oxford House
resident would strengthen that person's self-efficacy toward substance
abuse abstinence. Thus, theoretically, abstinence support may strengthen
one's own self-efficacy for abstinence and as social investment in abstinence
support becomes stronger, increases in the person's abstinence self-efficacy
may promote substance abuse abstinence.
The proposed study will use an
accelerated longitudinal design to examine the relation between abstinence
support (moderated by social investment), development of self-efficacy,
and successful abstention from substance use in a national sample of Oxford
House residents. In this study, we will recruit a sample of 151 Houses,
each with 8 residents on average, yielding approximately 1,208 residents.
The participants will be interviewed at the initial baseline phase and
tracked for one year. Follow-up interviews will be conducted at 3-month
intervals for a total of 5 assessments per individual. The specific
aims to evaluate new dimensions of Longabaugh et al.'s (1993) model are:
1) to examine whether increases in self-efficacy predict successful substance
use outcomes (i.e., abstinence status, reduction in symptoms, and quantity
of use); and, 2) to examine whether changes in the degree of abstinence
support received, moderated by social investment, promote these
increases in self-efficacy.