Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
"Leonard A"
  •                 Leonard A. Jason, Ph.D.
2
 
3
Oxford Houses

  • Self-governing recovery homes
    • Rental housing
    • 6-10 recovering people in a house
    • No residency time limits


  • Rules
    • Pay equal share of rent and expenses
    • Zero tolerance -- Expulsion for alcohol or drug use
    • Follow house rules decided by majority house vote


4
"Grassroots movement"
  • Grassroots movement
  • Founded in 1975 by Paul Molloy
    • now over 1,200 Oxford Houses within 40 states
    • about 10,000 individuals


  • The network of Oxford Houses is
    • Self-administered and operated
5
Possible Active Ingredients
  • A substance-free environment without restrictions on length of stay
    • opportunity to live away from relapse triggers
    • might help residents remain substance-free
  • Encouragement to spend time with one another
    • might develop interpersonal networks that support abstinence
6
"Residents held accountable for their..."
  • Residents held accountable for their behavior by peers in recovery
    • residents must pay rent
    • contribute to the maintenance of the home
    • refrain from engaging in disruptive behaviors
  • If residents are disruptive
    • fined
    • required meet with other residents to address their difficulties
  • If problems persist
    • residents placed on a “contract”
    • specify needed behavior changes

7
"Expectations for appropriate behavior plus..."
  • Expectations for appropriate behavior plus consequences such as fines and contracts
    • might provide contingencies that help individuals in recovery develop interpersonal and other life skills


  • Oxford House residents encouraged utilize 12-step groups
    • might contribute to long-term sobriety among individuals in recovery

8
First Pilot Study:
Characteristics of Residents

  • Data collected in 11 states
  • Consistent with studies from substance abuse programs
    • 53% never married
    • 58% Caucasian
    • 78% male
    • 71% at least high school education
    • 69% employed
    • 64% had experienced homelessness
      • Jason, Ferrrari, Groessl & Dvorchak (1997)

9
 Second Pilot Study:
Illinois Oxford Houses
  • 11 Oxford Houses (OH) were opened in Illinois beginning in 1992


  • Interviews conducted with 132 residents who had recently entered the houses



10
Findings

  • Reasons for choosing to reside in an OH
    • Fellowship and a structured setting where successful substance abuse outcomes were enforced
  • Residents said this setting:
    • allowed fellowship with similar others
    • stability in their life
    • a period of time for personal growth and change
        • Jason, Ferrari et al. (1997)

11
Gender Differences
  • Women more likely:
    • reported sexual abuse
    • diagnosed with eating disorders
    • engaged in writing bad checks prior to recovery
    • sought OH for a structured and safe setting
  • Men more likely:
    • engaged in drug sales and theft
    • entered OHs as an attempt to rebuild relationships
      • Ferrari, Curtin-Davis, Dvorchak, & Jason (1997)
12
Other Characteristics
  • 82% residents had previous history of criminal involvement
  • 76% used 12-step programs
  • Most able to maintain employment
      • Jason, Ferrari, Smith et al. (1997); Nealon -Woods, Ferrari, & Jason (1995)



13
Two Year Follow-up
  • 62% positive outcomes
    • remained in the house or left on good terms
  • Those with lower pessimism scores stayed longer than those with higher pessimism
  • Older residents longer stays than younger residents
  • Length of stay positively related to increases in  Perceived Sense of Community
      • Bishop, Jason, Ferrari, & Huang  (1998); Bishop, Chertok, & Jason  (1997)
14
Third Pilot Study: St. Louis OH Sample
  • Psychiatric Diagnoses
    • 58% Antisocial Personality Disorder
    • 39% Mood disorders
    • 35% Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
  • 52% reported two or more psychiatric disorders
  • 21%  had no psychiatric disorder other than substance abuse
  • 6 month Follow-up: 69% had positive outcomes
    • remained residents or left the house on good terms
        • Majer, Jason, Ferrari  & North  (2002)


15
2 NIH Grant Supported Studies (1999-2006)
  • NIAAA study randomized outcome study
    • within the state of Illinois
    • comparing outcomes of Oxford Houses and usual post-treatment residence
  • NIDA study
    • longitudinal design
    • national sample of Oxford House residents
16
NIAAA Study
  • Participants just completing substance abuse treatment
  • Randomly assigned to either an Oxford House or Usual Care condition
    • 150 of 154 approached individuals agreed to participate
    • All participants assigned to Oxford House condition were accepted



17
Design

  • Participants were interviewed every 6 months for a 24 month period (Four waves)


  • Across the 24-month assessment
    • Oxford House, 89%
    • Usual care, 86%



18
Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM)
  • Examined repeated measures data over time nested within individual (i.e., person-level characteristics such as demographic and condition-related variables)
  • Dependent variables included
    • substance abuse related outcomes
    • employment status outcomes
    • criminal activity outcomes
19
Outcomes at 24-month Follow-up
  • OH compared to Usual care group
    • higher abstinence rates (69%  vs 35%)
      • An important person in each participant’s support network confirmed the participant’s level of abstinence at the 24 month follow-up
    • higher monthly income ($989 vs  $440)
    • lower incarceration rates (3% vs  9%)
      • Jason, Olson, Ferrari, & LoSasso (2006)
20
Custody Issues
  • Oxford House condition
    • 14 women were able to obtain custody of their children
    • 1 woman lost custody
  • Usual care condition
    • 6 women gained custody of their children
    • 2 women lost custody of their children.
21
Effects of Residing in an OH for 6 or More Months
  • at 24 Month Follow-up
  • OH residents with ≥ 6 months compared to        < 6 months living in an OH
    • Higher abstinence (84% vs 54%)
    • Higher employment rates (85% vs 68%)
    • Higher self-regulation scores
      • Jason, Olson, Ferrari, Majer, Alvarez, & Stout (2006)

22
24 Month Abstinence Rates
23
 
24
 
25
NIDA Funded Study
  • Examined the processes of                     social support, self-efficacy, and abstinence
  • Explored in a national sample of Oxford House residents (n = 897)
  • Residents were recruited and interviewed at an initial baseline phase
    • then re-interviewed at three subsequent
    •    4-month intervals (waves)
26
Completion Wave 4
  • Contacted a random sample of  the participant's most important people
    • vast majority of collateral reports consistent with participants’ self reports of abstinence
27
Wave 4 Outcomes
  • 13.5% had relapsed
  • Employment
    • income significantly increased from $794 to $942 per month
    • 80% of participants employed
  • Incarceration
    • less than 5%
      • Jason,  Davis, Ferrari, & Anderson  (in press)

28
Predictors of Cumulative Abstinence
  • Staying in OH at least 6 months was related to increased self-efficacy and maintaining abstinence


  • Results are consistent with partial mediational process




29
 
30
 
31
 
32
Similarities Among Oxford Houses
  • Oxford Houses across  diverse regions of US
    • residents were found to live in rather similar dwellings
  • Houses were generally located in mid to high SES
    • few intoxicated persons, drug dealers, or homeless
    • few empty lots, pawnshops, or bars/pubs nearby
    • public transportation was available
    • streets and neighborhoods were clean
    • well lit at night
      • Ferrari, Jason, Sasser, Davis, & Olson (2006)
33
International Similarities
  • US vs Australia OHs
    • Neighborhoods of Oxford Houses similar
      • community amenities
      • grocery stores
      • churches
      • medical clinics
        • Ferrari,  Jason, Blake, Davis,  & Olson (2006)
34
Observations at Weekly OH Meetings
  • Observed interactions during business meetings at 29 Illinois Oxford Houses
  • Policies and organizational issues
    • Action plans included strategies to correct a resident’s problem behavior
    • Developing an action plan was related to receiving emotional support
    • Voting was associated with lower conflict and increased communications involving action plans
      • Jason, Ferrari,  Freeland, Danielewicz, & Olson (2006)
35
OH vs Therapeutic Communities
  • Both prohibited:
    • self-injurious behaviors
      • physical self-harm
    • setting destructive acts
      • destroying site property or possessions of others
  • OHs more liberal
    • sleeping late in the morning or staying out late at night
    • going away for a weekend
    • having “private time” in their locked room with guests
    • have their own personal possessions (pictures, furniture)
      • Ferrari,  Jason,  Davis, Olson,  & Alvarez (2004)
36
OH versus Criminal Justice
  • OH residents compared to clients from traditional inpatient criminal justice programs
  • No significant differences:
    • education
    • job history
    • criminal history
    • drug use
      • Oleniczak, Olabode-Dada, Viola, Davis,  Olson, Ferrari, & Jason  (2002)
37
OH vs Attending AA

  • History of serving time in jail
    • 83% of OH members
    • 55% for the 12-step members
  • 12-step members with convictions
    • lower optimism and less confident that they could remain abstinent
  • Oxford House members with and without convictions
    • similar levels of optimism and beliefs they could remain abstinent
      • Majer,  Jason, & Olson (2004)
38
OH and Criminal/Aggressive Behaviors

  • 6 months or longer living in an OH
    • associated with lower levels
      • criminal and aggressive behaviors
        • Aase, Jason, Olson, Majer, Ferrari, Davis, & Virtue  (2006)
39
Women in Oxford House
  • 90% used alcohol and cocaine for over 10 years
    • 67% had experienced depression
    •  46% had attempted suicide
    • 95% had experienced some form of past trauma
  • Despite these severe past histories
    • highest Sense of Community scores of any group ever examined with this measure
      • Olson, Curtis, Jason, Ferrari, Horin, Davis, Flynn, & Alvarez (2003)
40
OHs for Women and
Women with Children
  • Good leaders had the following qualities:
    • knowledge of rules
    • good role models without being overbearing or bossy
    • compassionate, open-minded, and listened to others
  • Women in the houses viewed children with a sense of responsibility
    • regardless of whether or not the child were their own
  • Children had a positive effect on house members
    • D’Arlach, Olson, Jason, & Ferrari (2006); Davis, Dziekan, Horin, Jason,  Ferrari, & Olson (2006)
41
Psychiatric Co-Occurring Conditions
  • Psychiatric severity over a one-year period
  • No significant differences residents with high versus low baseline psychiatric severity
    • number of days in outpatient
    • residential psychiatric treatments
    • abstinence rates
      • Majer,  Jason, North, Davis, Olson, Ferrari, Aase, & Molloy (2006)
42
Medical Care Needs
  • 292 female and 604 male residents of OH
    • those not employed
      • used medical care more often
    • those who used pharmaceutical drugs
      • used medical care more often
        • Ponitz, Olson, Jason, Davis, Ferrari (2006)
43
"Neighbors next to an OH..."
  • Neighbors next to an OH and a block away
  • Property values not significantly different
  • Those who lived next to an OH versus had significantly more positive attitudes:
    • concerning the importance of substance abusing individuals being able to live in residential neighborhoods
    • about the importance of neighbors providing a supportive environment to those in recovery
    • regarding attitudes of a self-run recovery home on their block
      • Jason, Roberts,  & Olson (2005)
44
OH Resident Involvement
  • Significant correlation between the length of time staying in an OH and involvement in the community
  • 86% of residents felt that living in the Oxford House increased their likelihood of involvement in their neighborhoods
  • OH residents reported spending 10.6 hours per week on neighborhood involvement
    • 35% were involved in mentoring others in recovery
    • 44% were involved in administering and running support groups.
    • 56% were involved in educating the community about the OH
    • 36% were involved in educating the community on recovery in general
45
"Involvement in community initiatives"
  • Involvement in community initiatives:
    • 39% of participants reported involvement in informing or advising agencies or local leaders
    • 32% reported involvement in community anti-drug campaigns
    • 16% speaking at political events
    • 30% attending community meetings
    • 21% public hearings and forums
      • Jason,  Schober & Olson (2006)

46
Dissemination of Oxford Houses
  • Significant expansion of houses when states employed an outreach worker to provide technical assistance
      • Jason, Braciszewski, Olson & Ferrari (2005)
47
 
48
Conclusions
49
After treatment for substance abuse

  • Many clients return to former high-risk environments or stressful family situations


  • Returning to these settings without a network of people to support abstinence increases chances of relapse
50
Self-governed, Structured Aftercare settings
  • Like Oxford Houses


  • Important public policy implications for stabilizing individuals with substance abuse histories


51
"More information on these studies..."
  •   More information on these studies is available at:


  •       http://condor.depaul.edu/~ljason/oxford